We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Occlusion vs Acupuncture for Treating Amblyopia

Lawrence E. Leguire, PhD, MBA
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(9):1240-1242. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.256.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In a recent article, Zhao and colleagues1 undertook a study in which they compared standard occlusion therapy for 2 hours per day to acupuncture for older children with amblyopia. As the Program Director of the Ohio Amblyope Registry, the first and only statewide program for children with amblyopia and their families, I found the research to be interesting, but limited.

The acupuncture therapy involved 5 sessions per week for 25 weeks in which needles were inserted at 5 locations (acupoints) including the top of the head, the left and right sides of an eye, a hand, and a lower leg for a total of 625 needle insertions. Needles were twisted after insertion and left in place for 15 minutes. Some of the needle insertions were one-half to three-fourths inches deep (LI4, BL59). Acupuncture and occlusion were assessed after 15 weeks as an outcome measure. The authors report that visual acuity in the amblyopic eye improved 1.83 lines in the occlusion group and 2.27 lines in the acupuncture group, which they stated as being equivalent.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





September 1, 2011
Alex H. Fan, FRCOphth; Jianhao Zhao, MD; Li Jia Chen, MD, PhD; Dorothy S. P. Fan, MBChB, FRCS; Mingzhi Zhang, MD; Ping Chung Leung, MD; Robert Ritch, MD; Dennis S. C. Lam, MD, FRCOphth
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(9):1240-1242. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.257.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.