0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Rethinking Surface Tension and Buoyancy—Reply

Yosanan Yospaiboon, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(8):1109-1110. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.177.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

In reply

We appreciate Gupta's discussion of the effect of surface tension and buoyancy force in retinal detachment repair and the mathematical postulations of Foster and Chou.1 Using air in pneumatic retinopexy is not a new idea. In 1993, Sebag and Tang2 performed pneumatic retinopexy using 0.8 mL of filtered air, and the reattachment rate was 86.7% (39 of 45 eyes) after single intravitreal injection. In this case series, a paracentesis of the anterior chamber was performed in all patients. In 1995, we3 also demonstrated a reattachment rate of 75% (15 of 20 eyes) following a single injection of 0.5 to 0.75 mL of filtered air for pneumatic retinopexy and a final reattachment rate of 90% (18 of 20 eyes) after subsequent procedures. On subgroup analysis, the reattachment rate in phakic eyes was 88.24% (15 of 17) following a single injection and 94.12% (16 of 17 eyes) after subsequent procedures. We concluded that pneumatic retinopexy with air can be performed in some selected phakic retinal detachment with a success rate comparable with the procedure using expansile gases.

Topics

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

August 1, 2011
Yosanan Yospaiboon, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(8):1109-1110. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.177.
August 1, 2011
Deepak Gupta, MRCOphth, MBA
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(8):1109-1110. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.176.
CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();