Editorial |

Thyroid-Associated Periorbitopathy:  Of Mountains, Measurements, and Levels of Evidence

Geoffrey E. Rose, MS. DSc, FRCS, FRCOphth
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(3):378-379. doi:10.1001/archopthalmol.2011.1883.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


On being asked why he wanted to climb Mount Everest, the famous mountaineer George Mallory replied, “Because it's there!” Higher primates seem to have an innate curiosity about their surrounding world, mankind having honed this quest for knowledge into the discipline of scientific investigation. In many cases, the enquiring and scientific mind would appear to be climbing mountains just because they are there, leading to the investigation or publication of studies without obvious value. However, the logical acquisition of knowledge and comprehension is a stepwise process, whereby scientific observation moves the subject from absolute uncertainty (no knowledge or understanding), to accurate observation with a rudimentary understanding (as with Medieval astronomy or medical case reports), to modification of early and sometimes incorrect conjecture to sound hypothesis based on greater levels of evidence (as with Johannes Kepler's observations on planetary motion or medical case series), and finally to observational evidence or formal logic that shifts a hypothesis toward absolute certainty; whether the latter state is possible remains debatable.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination
Evidence Summary and Review 1

The Rational Clinical Examination
Evidence Summary and Review 2