We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Correspondence |

Botulinum Toxin Treatment of Infantile Esotropia in Children

Malcolm R. Ing, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(6):833. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


McNeer et al in their article titled "Botulinum Toxin Management of Essential Infantile Esotropia in Children" (Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1411-1417) reported their extensive experience with this modality of treatment.

In a previous independent best-case study of patients who actually achieved alignment for a minimum of 6 months (during the first 2 years of life) after botulinum injections into the medial recti, I found a direct relationship between the quantity of the initial deviation with the number of injections required to achieve alignment.1 In general, patients with 40 prism diopters (PD) or more of esotropia required 3 or more medial recti injections to achieve alignment. I am wondering if the authors also found a similar correlation of the quantity of the initial deviation with the number of injections necessary to align the patient. Which leads me to the next point: The authors report a mean initial deviation of only 33 PD which is significantly smaller than the mean initial deviation of 55 PD reported in several larger groups that were treated surgically.2,3 Indeed, this observation was also made in Kushner's editorial in the same journal issue (Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1458-59.) The question arises, therefore: Is the authors' series representative of the typical essential infantile esotropia group of patients?


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.