We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

Systemic and Ocular Risks Associated With Therapies for Macular Degeneration: Clarification vs Confusion

Thomas R. Friberg, MS, MD; Veeral Shah, MD; Richard A. Bilonick, PhD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(6):806-807. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.1914.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Understanding the possible safety issues related to anti–vascular endothelial growth factor agents as used in ophthalmology is important, and Curtis et al1 attempted to clarify these issues. Independent of the risks inherent in intravitreous injections themselves (endophthalmitis, cataract) or concerns about just how a batch of bevacizumab-filled syringes was compounded, systemic safety questions still linger. Apparent higher incidences of cerebrovascular accident and myocardial infarction (MI) were intermittently signaled during the ANCHOR and SAILOR clinical trials of ranibizumab.2 Although the overall significance was difficult to interpret, 2 subsequent independent meta-analyses of these and other studies3,4 continue to raise questions of the potential stroke risks of intravitreous ranibizumab, particularly in patients who had already had such an event. Even if such risks are small, there is physiological plausibility for having such concerns, especially when using a pan–vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor (bevacizumab and ranibizumab).2,5


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





June 1, 2012
Lesley H. Curtis, PhD; Bradley G. Hammill, MS; Kevin A. Schulman, MD; Scott W. Cousins, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(6):806-807. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.100.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...