0
Small Case Series |

Effect of Peripapillary Vitreous Opacity on Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness Measurement Using Optical Coherence Tomography

Young Hoon Hwang, MD; Yong Yeon Kim, MD, PhD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(6):789-792. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.2517.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a widely used technique for the measurement of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. It emits a light from the light source to the retina or reference mirror and measures RNFL thickness by detecting the different reflectivities of retinal structures.1 Therefore, any media opacity in the cornea, lens, or vitreous body can affect OCT measurement. However, little is known about the effect of vitreous opacity on RNFL thickness measurement. Vitreous opacity associated with age-related posterior vitreous detachment is a commonly found abnormality.23 In aged eyes with posterior vitreous detachment, a vitreous opacity can float around the optic disc and can affect peripapillary RNFL measurement. We report 3 cases of peripapillary vitreous opacities with or without RNFL thickness change in eyes with ocular hypertension or glaucoma.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 1. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements in case 1. A, At the first examination, a peripapillary vitreous opacity (arrows) was detected outside the scan circle (outermost circle in the deviation map). B, At the second examination, the vitreous opacity (arrows) had moved to the adjacent area, where the scan circle met the opacity, and the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness at the 5-o’clock sector (arrowhead) had decreased from 78 to 58 μm. C, At the third examination, the vitreous opacity (arrow) was positioned exactly on the nasal side of the optic nerve head, the optic disc center was displaced inferior-nasally in the deviation map, the disc margin was changed, and the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness increased in the superior-temporal area (10- to 12-o’clock sectors) and decreased in the inferior-nasal area (4- to 7-o’clock sectors) (arrowheads).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 2. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements in case 2. A, At the first examination, a peripapillary vitreous opacity (arrows) was detected outside the scan circle (outermost circle in the deviation map). B, At the second examination, the vitreous opacity (arrows) had crossed the scan circle and the retinal nerve fiber layer thicknesses of the 6- and 7-o’clock sectors (arrowheads) had decreased from 119 to 102 μm and 132 to 47 μm, respectively. C, At the third examination, although the vitreous opacity (arrow) crossed the scan circle, the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness change was not remarkable.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 3. Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements in case 3. A, At the first examination, there was no vitreous opacity floating around the optic disc. B, At the second examination, a peripapillary vitreous opacity (arrow) crossing the scan circle was found but was not associated with a substantial retinal nerve fiber layer thickness change.

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Correspondence

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
Jobs