We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Letters |

The Economics of the Initial Preventive Physical Examination in Medicare

Steven Kymes, PhD; Rohit Varma, MD, MPH; Anne L. Coleman, MD, PhD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(9):1232-1234. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1217.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


We read with interest the article by Rein et al1 in which they used a decision analytic model and found that vision screening during the initial preventive physical examination does not meet accepted standards for cost-effectiveness; however, such modeling is very dependent on the underlying assumptions, many of which are contentious. For example, a key parameter in their simulation was the sensitivity of screening for detection of uncorrected refractive error (sensitivity, 0.70), which was drawn from a British study of 89 patients with hip fracture.2 A complete 1-way sensitivity analysis of this essential variable to determine at what value of sensitivity vision screening in the initial preventive physical examination would be preferred is needed, as is a discussion on whether that value is clinically viable. Without sensitivity analyses of key assumptions, an essential element of decision analytic modeling, readers do not have an understanding of the confidence they can have in the results. We encourage the authors to perform sensitivity analyses on all of their assumptions so the vision community might fully evaluate their recommendations.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





September 1, 2012
David Rein, PhD; John Wittenborn, BS
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(9):1232-1234. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.1702.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.