0
Clinical Sciences |

Methanol Poisoning:  Predictors of Visual Outcomes

Tejas Desai, MS; Aditya Sudhalkar, MS; Usha Vyas, MS; Bakulesh Khamar, MS
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(3):358-364. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1463.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective  To determine whether laboratory markers of methanol ingestion and subsequent toxicity can serve as predictors of visual outcomes in patients.

Methods  Retrospective medical record review of 122 patients in a cluster outbreak of methanol poisoning. Data collected included history, complete ocular and systemic examination details, time to presentation, amount of alcohol ingested, and results of laboratory investigations, such as hemogram, glucose levels, hematocrit level, arterial pH, methanol levels, potassium and bicarbonate levels, and anion and osmolar gap determination, as well as hepatic and renal function tests. Therapy administered consisted of ethyl alcohol, sodium bicarbonate, and nutritional supplements, with hemodialysis in severe cases. Visual acuity (VA), pupillary reaction, and optic disc findings were assessed at presentation and 3 months after discharge. Patients were classified according to their visual disturbance: transient (group 1) or permanent (group 2). Appropriate statistical analysis was performed. Outcome measures included determining the association between biochemical markers of methanol poisoning and final VA.

Results  A total of 122 patients (1 female and 121 male) were admitted for treatment; of these, 10 died. Only 1 patient showed a 2-line drop in VA. pH was the strongest predictor of final VA and improvement in VA among all markers. The odds that a patient with an initial pH greater than 7.2 would have only transient visual disturbances were high (odds ratio, 31; 95% CI, 6-149).

Conclusions  The degree of acidosis at presentation appears to determine final VA; early presentation and treatment did not seem to significantly alter the visual outcome, especially in severe poisoning.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 1. Protocol for inclusion and exclusion of patients for the study of predictors of visual outcomes in methanol poisoning.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 2. General guidelines that were followed for treatment of patients with methanol poisoning. Individual cases may have had requirements that necessitated deviation from this flowchart.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Grahic Jump Location

Figure 3. Color fundus photographs of the right eye of a patient from group I. A, At presentation, the patient manifested a visual acuity of 0.6 logMAR and a sluggish pupillary reaction in the same eye. The picture is essentially that of a normal-looking fundus, with a clear media; an average-sized disc with cup to disc ratio of 0.3/0.4 with some temporal pallor; and clear, well-defined disc margins without evident disc hyperemia and edema or retinal edema. B, Three months after discharge, the picture appears unchanged, but the patient had improved to 0.0 logMAR and the pupillary reflex was normal in the right eye. The patient probably had retrobulbar neuritis, which resolved with therapy.

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

References

Correspondence

CME
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment
Methanol Poisoning: Predictors of Visual Outcomes
Posted on April 2, 2013
Allan J. Flach
University of California San Francisci
Conflict of Interest: None Declared
It is reassuring that Dr. Desai et al (1) have confirmed that the degree of acidosis at presentation correlates with final visual acuity in their retrospective study of medical records of 122 patients as previously reported.(2) Unfortunately, the authors have failed to mention this 1953 paper within their references. This previous prospective study by Drs. Curtis Benton Jr. and Phinizy Calhoun Jr. involved 320 people exposed to methanol. Their paper includes careful follow up of 123 patients, with color photographs and visual fields and pathology reports from some of the 37 deaths. They concluded from their observations that presenting visual acuity and initial pupil reactions to light and degree of acidosis all correlated with prognosis for life or eventual restoration of visual acuity. Therefore, to preserve best vision ophthalmologists simply recommend doing every thing possible to save the patient's life which usually consists of intensive and prolonged alkalinization.1. Desai T, Sudhalkar A, Vyas U, Khamar B. Methanol poisoning: Predictors of visual outcomes. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(3):358-364.2. Benton CD, Calhoun FP. The ocular effects of methyl alcohol poisoning: Report of a catastrophe involving 320 persons. Am J Ophthalmol. 1953;36:1677-1685. Thank you,Allan J. Flach, M.D.Professor of OphthalmologyUniversity of California San Francisco
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Jobs