The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention report that osteoarthritis affects 27 million adults in the United States. Glucosamine sulfate is a naturally occurring substance found in human cartilage and a precursor for glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). A combination of supplements, glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate, was shown in the Glucosamine/Chondroitin Arthritis Intervention Trial to aid moderate to severe osteoarthritic knee pain.1
Open-angle glaucoma affects more than 2 million individuals in the United States, and this number continues to increase owing to the rapid aging of the US population.2 Normal aqueous outflow of the eye is regulated by the content of GAGs.3 Researchers postulate that excessive deposits of GAG in the trabecular meshwork restrict outflow. Another theory suggests that increased release of GAG into the aqueous causes an osmotic effect, drawing more water into the anterior chamber, thus causing swelling, a decrease in pore size, and eventual increased resistance to outflow.3 Either of these proposed mechanisms could lead to an increased thickness of the pore lining and/or decreased outflow, resulting in increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Excessive glucosamine molecules may similarly elevate IOP.
In a small retrospective clinical study, we examine the relationship between glucosamine supplementation and increased IOP in patients with glaucoma who supplement with glucosamine.
This retrospective study was reviewed by the University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine Review Board Chair. Patients had been serially selected by their history of glucosamine supplementation and ocular hypertension (IOP >21 mm Hg) or established diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma, willingness to electively stop using glucosamine, IOP measurements at least 3 times within 2 years, and no concomitant changes in glaucoma medications or eye surgery.
For analysis, patients were divided into 2 groups: cohort A with between 1 and 3 previously measured baseline IOPs who then began glucosamine supplementation; and cohort B without preexisting IOP measurements prior to beginning glucosamine. Cohort A had IOP measured before glucosamine, while supplementing with glucosamine, and after discontinuing glucosamine. Cohort B had IOP measured only while supplementing with glucosamine and after discontinuing glucosamine. Statistical analysis used 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance with 2-tailed t test.
A total of 21 patients were identified, and 17 met inclusion criteria (6 men, 11 women; mean age, 76 years; age range, 62-90 years) (Table). In cohort A (n = 11), IOP increased significantly from before glucosamine supplementation to during glucosamine supplementation (P = .001) and decreased significantly from during glucosamine supplementation to discontinuation of glucosamine (P = .002) (Figure, A). In cohort B (n = 6), IOP significantly decreased in the discontinuation group (P = .008) (Figure, B). In cohorts A and B combined, patients discontinuing glucosamine supplementation had significantly decreased IOP, with a mean (SD) change from 19.5 (3.4) to 16.7 (3.0) mm Hg OD (mean change, −2.8 mm Hg; range, −1.0 to −5.3 mm Hg) and from 20.3 (2.9) to 17.3 (2.4) mm Hg OS (mean change, 3.0 mm Hg; range, +0.5 to −9.5 mm Hg) (P < .001) (Figure, C). There was no significant difference between the left and right eyes in each patient for any of the categories or comparisons.
Intraocular pressure (IOP) from patients in cohort A (n = 11) (A), cohort B (B), and cohorts A and B combined (C) before glucosamine (V), during glucosamine supplementation (Gl), and after discontinuing glucosamine (D/C).
The connection between glucosamine supplementation and increased IOP observed herein deserves further exploration. Of note, variables for which we did not account include glucosamine dosage, duration of treatment, brand variability (some are sold in combination with chondroitin sulfate), patients’ lack of recalling deviation from recommended doses, and compliance variability. While the pathological process of chronic ocular hypertension is not completely understood, morphological changes in collagen may precede increases in IOP. Some postulate that normal aqueous outflow is regulated by the content of GAGs and formation of a viscous, elastic, gel-like substance that acts as a filtration system.4 A critical level of hyaluronic acid may also be essential for maintaining a well-hydrated, semipermeable meshwork.4 In vitro research on human eyes has found a decrease in GAG synthesis, particularly hyaluronic acid, in glaucomatous eyes compared with healthy eyes.5 As mentioned, theories exist regarding an osmotic effect of GAGs leading to swelling and outflow resistance.3 We hypothesize that discontinuation of glucosamine supplementation reduces IOP by mechanisms similar to those of discontinuation of corticosteroid treatment, which shows a similar effect.6
Many questions are raised by glucosamine supplementation–associated IOP changes. This study shows a reversible effect of these changes, which is reassuring. However, the possibility that permanent damage can result from prolonged use of glucosamine supplementation is not eliminated. Monitoring IOP in patients choosing to supplement with glucosamine may be indicated.
Corresponding Author: Mona S. Doss, MA, University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine, 11 Hills Beach Rd, Biddeford, ME 04005 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Published Online: May 23, 2013. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.227
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Ophthalmology editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 1
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Original Article: Does This Patient Have a Hemorrhagic Stroke?
The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
All results at
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.