We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Viewpoint |

On the Edge The Clinician-Scientist in Ophthalmology

Reza Dana, MD, MPH, MSc1; Joan W. Miller, MD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(11):1401-1402. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.4883.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In the parlance of evolutionary biology, “on the edge” refers to endangered species nearing extinction, which we believe aptly describes contemporary clinician-scientists (for the purpose of this discussion, we differentiate clinician-scientists, who maintain patient interactions, from physician-scientists, who exclusively focus on research).

Much has been said about the near extinction of clinician-scientists.1 In his landmark Archives editorial in 1991, Epstein2 noted the economic pressures faced by academic ophthalmology departments (and junior faculty members therein), alerting us to the dwindling numbers of ophthalmologists conducting discovery-oriented research. A decade later, Weinreb3 revisited the plight of clinician-scientists—underscoring the increasing difficulties they faced in getting grant funding while attempting to maintain clinical productivity in an ever more competitive environment with sharply declining clinical reimbursements. Whereas Epstein bemoaned an academic culture with misplaced priorities, Weinreb focused more on structural shortcomings in clinician-scientist education and development.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

3 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles