0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
In This Issue of JAMA Ophthalmology |

Highlights FREE

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(10):1163. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5963.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

RESEARCH

Because most patients with low vision are older and have functional limitations from other health problems that could add to the functional limitations caused by their visual impairments, Goldstein and colleagues identify factors associated with visual ability measures among new patients of a prospective observational study seeking outpatient low vision rehabilitation services. Patients (N = 779) from 28 US clinical centers completed an adaptive visual function questionnaire and other questionnaires. Correlations were observed between visual acuity and baseline visual ability overall (r = −0.42) and across the 4 functional domains evaluated. The authors concluded that visual ability is a multidimensional construct, with visual acuity, depression, physical ability, and cognition explaining more than one-third of the variance in visual ability as measured by these questionnaires.

Quinn and colleagues evaluate the validity of a telemedicine system to identify infants who have sufficiently severe retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), as the present strategy requires repeated examinations of at-risk infants by physicians, although less than 10% require treatment. In this observational study, 1257 premature infants with birth weight less than 1251 g were examined starting at 32 weeks’ postmenstrual age by an ophthalmologist with digital imaging using a wide-field digital camera graded by 2 masked nonphysicians. Remote grading of images had a sensitivity of 81.9% and specificity of 90.1%, providing support for the validity of remote evaluation by trained nonphysician readers of digital retinal images taken by trained nonphysician imagers from infants at risk for ROP.

Guidelines recommend that long-term users of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine sulfate undergo regular evaluations to check for maculopathy. Nika and colleagues investigate whether patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) taking these medications are regularly visiting eye care providers and being screened for maculopathy in a managed care network. Among 18 051 beneficiaries with RA or SLE, 35.1% had at least 1 record of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine use and 7.8% had used chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for at least 4 years. Among these, 27.9% lacked regular eye care visits, 6.1% had no visits to eye care providers, and 34.5% had no diagnostic testing for maculopathy over 5 years. These data suggest that many patients at high risk for maculopathy associated with the use of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine are not undergoing routine monitoring for ophthalmic adverse effect.

Journal Club

Melki and colleagues report on a wireless intraocular pressure transducer in a human eye to evaluate preliminary safety data on the transducer prospectively. In a study participant with open-angle glaucoma who consented to receive the transducer in 1 eye, the device was implanted into the ciliary sulcus following extracapsular cataract extraction and “in the bag” intraocular lens implantation. No complications were noted intraoperatively, and no persistent intraocular inflammation, pigment dispersion, or angle narrowing were noted through 18 months. Further follow-up with more patients would be needed to gain a greater understanding of the safety of a device that might allow for constant monitoring of intraocular pressure in the future.

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

1,059 Views
0 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs