We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Postoperative Visual Acuity Should Be Reported in Studies of Binocular Summation

Christopher T. Leffler, MD, MPH1; Adam C. Janot, MD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Ophthalmology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(8):968-969. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0939.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor Pineles et al1 studied binocular summation, defined as the improvement in visual acuity (VA) using binocular vision compared with the better eye alone. The authors reported that strabismus surgery was associated with average improvements in binocular summation of 0.8 letters for VA and of 1.5 and 2.6 letters for VA at 2.5% and 1.25% contrast, respectively.1 The interpretation of the results might be aided by additional information. A more positive binocular summation value can result from better binocular vision, or from worse vision in the better eye. Consider a patient with a preoperative VA of 20/20, both binocularly and in the better eye. If the postoperative VA decreases to 20/25 binocularly and to 20/30 in the better eye, the patient will be reported to have an improvement in binocular summation of 1 line, despite the fact that the patient does not see as well. To address this possibility, it would be of value if the authors could report the mean preoperative and postoperative binocular and better-eye VA and contrast VA as well as the paired t-test value.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





August 1, 2015
Stacy L. Pineles, MD, MS
1Jules Stein Eye Institute, University of California, Los Angeles
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(8):969. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.0944.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...