We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Viewpoint |

The Future of Ultrawide Field Imaging for Diabetic Retinopathy Pondering the Retinal Periphery

Jennifer K. Sun, MD, MPH1,2; Lloyd Paul Aiello, MD, PhD1,2
[+] Author Affiliations
1Beetham Eye Institute, Joslin Diabetes Center, Boston, Massachusetts
2Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(3):247-248. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.5384.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


This Viewpoint discusses the advantages of ultrawide field imaging in documenting peripheral retinal pathology.

The rigorously standardized and validated grading system for diabetic retinopathy (DR) severity as outlined in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) in 19911 has allowed clinicians and researchers to compare diabetic retinal disease outcomes across diverse cohorts and to predict risks of retinopathy progression over time. Seminal studies defining current best practices for the evaluation and management of DR and diabetic macular edema have used this ETDRS protocol. However, due primarily to imaging limitations of the era in which it was developed, the ETDRS system only evaluates about 30% of the total retina area. Technological advances now allow us to image more than 80% of the retina with a single 200° field captured in a quarter-second. This new capability raises the important question of whether evaluation of retinal findings in areas outside the standard ETDRS fields may substantially impact patient management.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles