We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Investigation |

The Effect of Light Exposure on the Efficacy and Safety of Amphotericin B in Corneal Storage Media

Katherine Duncan, MD1; Jeff Parker, BS, MT(ASCP)2; Caroline Hoover, CEBT3; Bennie H. Jeng, MD, MS1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore
2University of Maryland Pathology Associates, PA, Baltimore
3SightLife, Inc, Seattle, Washington
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(4):432-436. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0008.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  The proportion of postkeratoplasty fungal infections is rising steadily. However, the most commonly used corneal storage medium in the United States, Optisol-GS, does not contain an antifungal additive.

Objectives  To determine the lowest concentration of amphotericin B supplementation in Optisol-GS that will eliminate fungal contaminants effectively without resulting in toxic effects to the cornea and to determine what role light exposure plays in the efficacy and safety of amphotericin B supplementation.

Design, Setting, and Materials  An in vitro laboratory efficacy study measured fungal colony growth in 10 vials of Optisol-GS supplemented with different concentrations of amphotericin B after inoculation with Candida albicans in light-exposed and light-protected conditions. Two vials each were supplemented with amphotericin B at concentrations of 0.06, 0.12, or 0.225 μg/mL; the remaining 2 vials received no C albicans inoculation and no antifungal supplementation (negative controls). After 24 hours, 1 vial from each pair was exposed to light for the remainder of the study. On days 2, 7, and 14, 1 mL of solution was removed from each vial and incubated at 36°C for 48 hours. In a separate safety study, 12 pairs of corneas were divided between amphotericin B supplementation and the control condition; 4 corneas each received the different amphotericin B concentrations. An additional 4 pairs of corneas were stored in the 0.225-μg/mL concentration, and 1 cornea from each pair was exposed to light for the duration of the study. Data were collected November 16, 2014, and analyzed from November 16 to 18, 2014, for the efficacy study; they were collected from April 14 to May 27, 2015, and analyzed from May 28 to 30, 2015, and on December 23, 2015, for the safety study.

Main Outcomes and Measures  Fungal colony growth was measured from the Optisol-GS vials. Corneal endothelial cell density, endothelial cell viability, and epithelial toxic effects were measured in stored corneas.

Results  In the efficacy study, Optisol-GS supplemented with concentrations of 0.06 and 0.12 μg/mL of amphotericin B eliminated all fungal contaminants by day 7 and reduced fungal growth on day 2 by a mean of 3.5 colony-forming units (95% CI, −6.19 to 13.20 colony-forming units; P = .34), a 77.8% decline compared with the postoperative controls. Optisol-GS supplemented with the 0.255-μg/mL concentration of amphotericin B eliminated all fungal contaminants by day 2. In the safety study, no evidence was found of toxic effects to the cornea in corneas stored in Optisol-GS supplemented with amphotericin B at any concentration compared with paired controls. No difference in the efficacy or safety of the light-exposed compared with light-protected amphotericin B–supplemented Optisol-GS was identified.

Conclusions and Relevance  In this study, Optisol-GS supplemented with a 0.255-μg/mL concentration of amphotericin B effectively eliminated fungal contaminants within 48 hours and did not result in added toxic effects to the cornea. These results do not prove that amphotericin B should be added to Optisol-GS; larger-scale studies and cost-benefit analyses need to be completed. Given the increasing incidence of postkeratoplasty fungal infection, however, the addition of amphotericin B to Optisol-GS deserves further investigation.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Fungal Colony Growth in Vials of Optisol-GS Corneal Storage Medium

The number of mean viable fungal colonies on days 2, 7, and 14 in vials of Optisol-GS supplemented with 0.06-, 0.12-, and 0.255-μg/mL concentrations of amphotericin B were compared between light-exposed and light-protected conditions in the efficacy study. CFU indicates colony-forming units.

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections