0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Investigation |

Association of Football Subconcussive Head Impacts With Ocular Near Point of Convergence

Keisuke Kawata, MS1,2; Leah H. Rubin, PhD, MPH3; Jong Hyun Lee1; Thomas Sim2; Masahiro Takahagi, MEd4; Victor Szwanki, MS4; Al Bellamy, MS4; Kurosh Darvish, PhD5; Soroush Assari, BS, MS5; Jeffrey D. Henderer, MD6; Ryan Tierney, PhD2; Dianne Langford, PhD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Neuroscience, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
2Department of Kinesiology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
3Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago
4Department of Athletics, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
5Department of Mechanical Engineering, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
6Department of Ophthalmology, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(7):763-769. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1085.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  An increased understanding of the relationship between subconcussive head impacts and near point of convergence (NPC) ocular-motor function may be useful in delineating traumatic brain injury.

Objective  To investigate whether repetitive subconcussive head impacts during preseason football practice cause changes in NPC.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This prospective, observational study of 29 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I football players included baseline and preseason practices (1 noncontact and 4 contact), and postseason follow-up and outcome measures were obtained for each time. An accelerometer-embedded mouthguard measured head impact kinematics. Based on the sum of head impacts from all 5 practices, players were categorized into lower (n = 7) or higher (n = 22) impact groups.

Exposures  Players participated in regular practices, and all head impacts greater than 10g from the 5 practices were recorded using the i1Biometerics Vector mouthguard (i1 Biometrics Inc).

Main Outcomes and Measures  Near point of convergence measures and symptom scores.

Results  A total of 1193 head impacts were recorded from 5 training camp practices in the 29 collegiate football players; 22 were categorized into the higher-impact group and 7 into the lower-impact group. There were significant differences in head impact kinematics between lower- and higher-impact groups (number of impacts, 6 vs 41 [lower impact minus higher impact = 35; 95% CI, 21-51; P < .001]; linear acceleration, 99g vs 1112g [lower impact minus higher impact= 1013; 95% CI, 621 – 1578; P < .001]; angular acceleration, 7589 radian/s2 vs 65 016 radian/s2 [lower impact minus higher impact= 57 427; 95% CI , 31 123-80 498; P < .001], respectively). The trajectory and cumulative burden of subconcussive impacts on NPC differed by group (F for group × linear trend1, 238 = 12.14, P < .001 and F for group × quadratic trend1, 238 = 12.97, P < .001). In the higher-impact group, there was a linear increase in NPC over time (B for linear trend, unstandardized coefficient [SE]:  0.76 [0.12], P < .001) that plateaued and resolved by postseason follow-up (B for quadratic trend [SE]: −0.06 [0.008], P < .001). In the lower-impact group, there was no change in NPC over time. Group differences were first observed after the first contact practice and remained until the final full-gear practice. No group differences were observed postseason follow-up. There were no differences in symptom scores between groups over time.

Conclusions and Relevance  Although asymptomatic, these data suggest that repetitive subconcussive head impacts were associated with changes in NPC. The increase in NPC highlights the vulnerability and slow recovery of the ocular-motor system following subconcussive head impacts. Changes in NPC may become a useful clinical tool in deciphering brain injury severity.

Figures in this Article

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.
Study Flowchart

Pads off indicates a noncontact practice; pads on indicates a full-contact practice.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.
Head Impact Kinematic Measurements Using Mouthguard and Sideline Monitoring System

A, Triaxial accel senses linear acceleration and triaxial gyro senses angular acceleration. B, Sideline antenna receives impact data by radio transmission and store in the network server. Accel indicates accelerometer and gyro indicates gyroscope.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.
Near Point of Convergence Between Groups Across Time Points

There was a group x time point interaction vs baseline. Polynomial indicates quadratic trend. Linear x time and quadratic x time interaction (P <.001) were driven by the near point of convergence change after pads-on 1 postpractice in the higher-impact group (P <.001). Pads off indicates a noncontact practice; pads on indicates a full-contact practice. aP = .06.bP < .01.cP < .001.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

708 Views
1 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
Jobs
JAMAevidence.com

Care at the Close of Life: Evidence and Experience
Clinical Trajectories of Severe Head Trauma in Children

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Quick Reference

brightcove.createExperiences();