We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
In This Issue of JAMA Ophthalmology |

Highlights FREE

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(8):853. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.3250.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


For the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study Group investigators, Drews-Botsch and coauthors evaluate the efficacy of patching to treat unilateral congenital cataract in children with deprivation amblyopia. In a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial of treatment for unilateral congenital cataract, an intraocular lens implanted during cataract surgery did not affect caregivers’ reported adherence to prescribed patching. A greater number of reported hours of patching throughout the first 4 years of life were associated with better visual acuity. These results support the association of occlusion throughout the preschool years with improved visual acuity in infants treated for unilateral congenital cataract. However, similar visual outcomes were achieved with varying amounts of patching.

Baig and coauthors evaluate rates of visual field (VF) loss associated with risk of falling in patients with glaucoma. In an observational cohort study of 116 patients diagnosed as having glaucoma followed up for a mean (SD) of 7.5 (2.6) years, each 0.5-dB/y faster rate of VF loss was associated with a history of self-reported falls, even after adjusting for confounding factors. They conclude that a history of rapid VF loss in patients with glaucoma was associated with risk of falls.

While a randomized clinical trial comparing anti–vascular endothelial growth factor agents for patients with decreased vision from diabetic macular edema (DME) found that aflibercept (2.0 mg) achieved better visual outcomes than repackaged (compounded) bevacizumab (1.25 mg) or ranibizumab (0.3 mg) at 1 year when the starting visual acuity was 20/50 or worse, aflibercept and ranibizumab are approximately 31 and 20 times more expensive, respectively, than bevacizumab. Ross and coauthors for the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of these anti–vascular endothelial growth factor therapies over bevacizumab for the treatment of DME. Visual acuity benefits of aflibercept and ranibizumab translated into modest quality-of-life improvements but at a high cost relative to bevacizumab, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios substantially higher than frequently cited thresholds.

The US Physician Payments Sunshine Act provides insight into the financial relationship between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry, creating opportunities of using data to better understand prior research that implicates pharmaceutical promotions as an important factor in a physician’s decision-making process. Taylor and coauthors evaluate the association between industry payments and physician choice of anti–vascular endothelial growth factor injections. They reviewed 2013 data from the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments program and found increasing numbers and amounts of industry payments correlated with higher use of total aflibercept and ranibizumab injections more so than with bevacizumab. Although pharmaceutical payments to physicians were associated with increased use of aflibercept and ranibizumab, the study could not determine whether the payments reported caused increased use, resulted in increased use, or were associated with other factors that caused increased use.





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.