0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
In This Issue of JAMA Ophthalmology |

Highlights FREE

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(9):957. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.3256.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

RESEARCH

Wiggins and Etz evaluate the American Board of Ophthalmology’s Maintenance of Certification Part 4 to consider its effects to assist diplomates with quality improvement in their practices. In a retrospective analysis of diplomates’ performance before and after 1408 performance improvement activities, performance improved on 80% of individual process measures and 38.9% of individual outcome measures. Positive comments outnumbered negative ones by a ratio of 5:1. While the study indicates that the program may help diplomates improve quality on both process and outcome measures, the analyses are limited to a self-report that has not been validated.

Rees and coauthors evaluate the association between clinical characteristics of diabetic retinopathy complications and symptoms of anxiety and depression. In a cross-sectional study of 519 participants with diabetes, the authors noted, as anticipated, a personal history of depression or anxiety was associated with symptoms of anxiety or depression. However, they also found that vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy and moderate or severe vision impairment were identified as independent risk factors for increased depressive symptoms in people with diabetes; an association of symptoms of anxiety with diabetic eye disease was not identified.

Deiner and coauthors assess whether internet-based data from social media and search engines provide novel sources of epidemiologic factors of infectious eye diseases that are associated with objective clinic-based diagnoses. Using data from encounters of 4143 patients diagnosed as having conjunctivitis, they found seasonality of clinical diagnoses of nonallergic conjunctivitis from electronic medical records correlated strongly with results of Google searches in the United States for the term pink eye and correlated moderately with Tweets about pink eye and with clinical diagnoses of influenza. Seasonality of clinical diagnoses of allergic conjunctivitis from electronic medical records correlated strongly with results of Google searches in the United States for the term eye allergy.

Vitale and coauthors seek to determine whether the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) detailed and simple severity scales for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) were generalizable to studies other than the original AREDS. They included both AREDS (1992-2001) and AREDS2 (2006-2012) enrolled patients. In AREDS (n = 4519), participants with varying severity of AMD—from no AMD to late AMD in 1 eye—were enrolled and in AREDS2 (n = 4203), participants with bilateral large drusen or large drusen in the study eye and late AMD in the fellow eye were enrolled. The authors found that the 5-year incidence rates of late AMD between AREDS and AREDS2, stratifying by baseline AMD scale score, did not differ, suggesting the AMD severity scales are generalizable to studies other than AREDS.

Continuing Medical Education and Journal Club

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

325 Views
0 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs