We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Comment & Response |

Interpreting Database Studies ONLINE FIRST

Timothy L. Jackson, PhD, FRCOphth1; Paul H. J. Donachie, MSc2,3; Robert L. Johnston, FRCOphth2
[+] Author Affiliations
1King’s College London School of Medicine, Department Ophthalmology, King’s College Hospital, London, England
2The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database, London, England
3Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, England
JAMA Ophthalmol. Published online September 08, 2016. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.3246
Text Size: A A A
Published online


To the Editor We read with interest the thoughtful Invited Commentary by Browning1 on our database study of diabetic vitrectomy.2 Browning highlights the difficulties of database studies and how they might be addressed. For example, can we manually validate the electronic operation note against the patient’s medical file, to confirm that any delamination was for tractional retinal detachment? While desirable, few database studies have permission to review individual patient’s files in this way. Browning asks whether the gauge of surgery might confound our analysis? It might. Yet database studies are not designed to isolate the effect of one variable, such as port size, which occurs among many others. They are better suited to observing outcomes in toto.


Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





September 8, 2016
David J. Browning, MD, PhD
1Charlotte Eye, Ear, Nose, and Throat Associates, Charlotte, North Carolina
JAMA Ophthalmol. Published online September 08, 2016.;():. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.3252.
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...