0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Other Articles |

Candid Reporting on Complications, Then and Now

Joseph Hoffman
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(2):308-309. doi:.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

Dr George Waring is correct in his article in ARCHIVES that both supporting and contradictory evidence must be presented if physicians are to make informed judgments.1 Because this applies to nonclinical as well as clinical questions, I must point out that he incorrectly characterized the 1992 article in Ocular Surgery News from which he selectively quoted.

Dr Waring called writers of articles such as the one on hexagonal keratotomy (HK) "uncritical" and said that candid reporting on complications was missing or "disguised." He mentioned that Drs Nordan and Maxwell "reported in the news media" their assessment of HK as a failure but specifically cited only their letter from the Journal of Refractive Surgery. In fact, the very first line of the page 1 article on HK by Dawn Harr in the August 1, 1992, issue of Ocular Surgery News was a quote from Dr Nordan: "Hexagonal keratotomy does not work and should be condemned." Dr Nordan is quoted extensively and just as unequivocally throughout the article, as in his statement that the main proponent of HK at the time "claims that the special way he teaches people to make these cuts makes it a better operation in his hands. I'm afraid I just don't believe that."

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();