We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Correspondence |

Controversy Regarding Pre-enucleation Radiation for Uveal Melanoma

Devron H. Char, MD; Theodore L. Phillips, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121(9):1346. doi:10.1001/archopht.121.9.1346.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In their letter, Fine et al1 cite our work as an example of an incorrect conclusion based on an observational study, which the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) has now corrected:"Observational data may be misleading, as illustrated by the findings of Char et al regarding pre-enucleation radiation therapy for large choroidal melanoma. These authors suggest that pre-enucleation radiation was harmful . . . ."

We are surprised at their adumbrated statement regarding our studies; we exchanged letters on pre-enucleation radiation for choroidal melanomas in the American Journal of Ophthalmology in 1989.2 At that time, we answered their question with the statement, "It is likely that patients' survival is not adversely affected by radiation; however it is almost inconceivable that pre-enucleation radiation will improve survival of these patients." Our earlier published work, on which the COMS group based their technique for pre-enucleation radiation, is similar to several other studies and the conclusion of the vastly more expensive COMS. Although we noted a correlation between radiation and worse survival in a retrospective analysis, our discussion clearly states that we felt pre-enucleation radiation did not improve survival in patients with choroidal melanoma. We offered a number of reasons why the inverse correlation between radiation and survival could have been spurious.3

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles