Author Affiliations: Department of Ophthalmology, Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Dr Davis is now with the Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston.
To assess lens clarity after 3-port lens-sparing vitrectomy for stages 4A and 4B tractional retinal detachment secondary to retinopathy of prematurity.
In a retrospective, interventional, consecutive clinical case series, 108 eyes of 102 patients who underwent lens-sparing vitrectomy for stages 4A and 4B tractional retinal detachment from February 1, 1998, through January 31, 2004, were reviewed. All procedures and follow-up examinations were performed by a single surgeon. Lens clarity was assessed at the final follow-up examination.
Of the 108 eyes reviewed, 102 (94.4%) maintained clear lenses at the final follow-up examination, which ranged from 6 to 48 months (mean, 32 months) after the procedure. Thirty-two eyes had stage 4A detachments and 76 eyes had stage 4B.
Three-port lens-sparing vitrectomy may be performed with relatively low risk of cataract formation during the early postoperative period. Maintenance of a clear crystalline lens during the critical period of visual development may lead to better functional outcomes.
Lens-sparing vitrectomy (LSV) directly addresses tractional forces in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) detachments and may improve visual rehabilitation after surgery by reducing the risks of aphakic deprivation or anisometropic amblyopia after vitrectomy/lensectomy and scleral buckle procedures, respectively.1- 5 Although aphakia management has improved considerably,amblyopia risks persist, and aphakia management remains a time-consuming task for the parents, patient, and pediatric ophthalmologist.5- 10 Although scleral buckle procedures do not affect the crystalline lens, anisometropic management is often required if only 1 eye undergoes the procedure, and a secondary dividing procedure is required as well.11 Also, some contend that scleral buckle procedures may not directly address tractional forces as well as LSV does.1- 5,11- 14 Maguire and Trese1 originally described the LSV technique as a 2-port, pars plicata approach wherein the instruments are inserted parallel to the visual axis, thus sparing the infantile crystalline lens. Ferrone et al3 reported an incidence of cataract formation of 15% in a series of eyes undergoing LSV that used that technique. In our series, we report the incidence of lens clarity using a 3-port LSV procedure specifically for stages 4A and 4B tractional retinal detachments (TRDs) secondary to ROP.
Institutional review board approval to review patient data was obtained for this study. We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive case series of 108 eyes in 102 patients who underwent 3-port LSV performed by a single surgeon (E.R.H.) from February 1, 1998, to January 31, 2004, for stage 4A or 4B ROP-related TRD without lens-retina apposition that precluded anterior vitreous removal. The main outcome measure was lens clarity at the final follow-up visit.
Before vitreous surgery, both eyes of each infant were examined. Oftentimes, before surgery on the more involved eye (often advanced stage 4B or stage 5), the eye with the less severe but progressive TRD underwent vitrectomy.
Infants were examined either at the bedside or in the outpatient clinic. Eyes with progressive stage 4A or 4B TRD were identified. Stage 4A TRD was defined as detachment of the retina threatening, but not yet involving, the macula. Stage 4B TRD was defined as detachment of the retina involving the macula.4,15,16 The zone of disease was determined according to examination results before the laser treatment and was defined according to the Multicenter Trial of Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity.17 Examination with the patient under anesthesia and surgery were performed within 48 hours of the initial examination. At the time of the procedure, a dilated fundus examination was performed on both eyes in every case. All eyes that underwent surgery were vascularly quiet at the time of vitreous surgery as a result of previous peripheral laser ablation. During surgery, special attention was paid to the extent and location of retina-lens apposition that would preclude LSV.
Lens clarity was evaluated before and after surgery with the use of a 25-diopter condensing lens with an indirect ophthalmoscope, thus magnifying the anterior segment through a dilated pupil. A red reflex view with further magnification of the anterior segment was used to look for subtle posterior subcapsular cataracts (PSCs) and cortical cataracts. Lens status was evaluated prior to vitreous surgery and at every postoperative visit by the attending surgeon (E.R.H.) in all cases. Postoperative follow-up consisted of return visits at least once a month for the first 6 months, followed by a return visit every 3 to 6 months thereafter. Any opacity noted postoperatively was recorded and followed. Because of difficulties in examining infants at the bedside, a slitlamp was not used to assess lens clarity. No established, standardized cataract grading system was used. Cataracts were considered visually significant as established in previous studies.1- 3 For example, impairment of the view to the posterior segment cataract, PSC, or posterior polar cataract greater than 3 mm centrally or cortical cataracts affecting the central lens and interfering with the view of the posterior segment were considered visually significant.3
The surgical technique involved a standard conjunctival opening for a 3-port vitrectomy, followed by a single sclerotomy placed 1 mm posterior to the limbus in the inferotemporal quadrant. The microvitreoretinal blade incision path was vertical and was advanced only until the widest portion of the blade cut the pars plicata epithelium to avoid damaging the retina immediately behind the sclerotomy. A 7-0 polyglactin 910 suture was then placed across the sclerotomy, followed by insertion and tying in place of a 2.5-mm, 20-gauge infusion cannula. Supporting the sclera during cannula insertion with toothed forceps ensured that the short tip fully penetrated the pars plicata epithelium. The infusion cannula tip position was then confirmed with the endoilluminator before turning on the infusion line. Additional sclerotomies were made in the superonasal and superotemporal quadrants, 1 mm posterior to the limbus. A standard 20-gauge endoilluminator and a radial reciprocating vitreous cutter (Alcon Accurus InnoVit Probe; Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas) were used for vitrectomy. Vitreous and membranes were removed with machine settings of 1200 to 1800 cuts/min and 150 to 200 mm Hg suction. The gas forced infusion setting for intraocular pressure was 20 mm Hg.
Surgical planes of vitreous were addressed in the following order: (1) ridge-retina to lens–anterior hyaloid face; (2) ridge to vitreous base; (3) ridge to ridge; (4) ridge to nerve; and (5) circumferentially along the ridge. Most of the dissection was carried out with the vitrectomy probe, but intraocular scissors were occasionally used, particularly to begin dissection of the anterior trough. Layers of sheetlike vitreous membranes were dissected sequentially approaching the retina. The posterior hyaloid face was often nondissectible and could not be removed. The ridge often could be trimmed but not fully excised without creating retinal breaks. A thorough peripheral retinal examination with scleral depression was then performed. If no retinal breaks were noted during the procedure, only balanced salt solution (BSS; Alcon Surgical, Fort Worth) was infused. If retinal breaks were noted during the procedure, 14% perfluoropropane or silicone oil was used as a long-acting tamponade. The sclerotomies were then closed using 7-0 polyglactin 910 sutures sewn in a vertical mattress fashion. Postoperatively, a specific prone positioning requirement was important only if air or 14% perfluoropropane had been used so that the substance would not sit in apposition to the posterior aspect of the lens.
Three-port LSV was performed in all eyes. The patients’ demographic information is listed in Table 1. Three eyes (2.8%) underwent repeat LSV (all were stage 4B eyes), but only the first operation was counted for this study. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months.The range of follow-up was 6 to 48 months (mean follow-up, 32 months) (Table 1). In the stage 4A group, mean follow-up was 28 months (range, 6-42 months). Of these, 25 (78%) of the 32 eyes were followed up for at least 1 year and 19 eyes (59%) were followed up for at least 2 years. In the stage 4B group, the mean follow-up was 35 months (range, 9-48 months). Of these, 59 (78%) of the 76 eyes were followed up for at least 1 year and 48 eyes (63%) were followed up for at least 2 years.
The 6 eyes that developed cataracts after vitrectomy are listed in Table 2. The range of time after surgery until significant cataract development was 4 to 144 weeks (mean, 46 weeks). Four of the cataracts developed in the stage 4B TRD group. Four of the cataracts were cortical and 2 were PSCs. Four of the 6 cataracts that developed after LSV (both of the PSCs and 2 of the cortical cataracts) were removed because they involved the visual axis. The remaining 2 eyes had peripheral cortical changes and did not undergo lensectomy. Five of the 6 eyes required tamponade after vitrectomy: 3 that required 14% perfluoropropane infusion and 2 that required silicone oil. All 5 developed cataracts after LSV. The eyes that were treated with 14% perfluoropropane all developed cortical changes and 1 eye required lensectomy. One eye infused with silicone oil developed cortical changes and the other developed a PSC, but both required lensectomy.
Retina–crystalline lens apposition at surgery was noted in 2 (6%) of the 32 eyes in the stage 4A group and 7 (9%) of the 76 eyes in the stage 4B group. Instrument-lens apposition was noted in 3 (6%) of the 32 eyes in the stage 4A group and 9 (12%) of the 76 stage 4B eyes. Two eyes in the stage 4A group developed cataracts without instrument-lens apposition; 1 of these also had retina-lens apposition. Four eyes with stage 4B TRDs developed cataracts. None had retina-lens apposition but 3 had instrument-lens apposition. The 2 eyes that developed cataract changes without any apparent retina-lens apposition, or less trauma, were both infused with long-acting tamponade (one with 14% perfluoropropane, one with silicone oil).
Unlike in the adult population, where significant lens opacification occurs after vitrectomy for diabetes mellitus, macular hole, and macular pucker,18- 26 we hypothesized that the infantile crystalline lens may be more resistant to cataract formation after vitrectomy surgery. There are numerous possible reasons for this.3 First, because of intrinsic anatomic limitations in technique, some residual vitreous (anterior hyaloid face) remains as a protective barrier against the posterior lens surface. Because little to no liquefaction has occurred, the gel may be a mechanical buffer or a diffusion barrier that limits lens injury. Second, the lens epithelium in infantile lenses may be able to better withstand metabolic, hydrostatic, and mechanical insult than that in adult lenses. Third, adult eyes have sustained more metabolic and light-induced damage, and thus are probably more susceptible to cataractous changes after vitrectomy. In our study, only 6 eyes (5.6%) developed cataractous changes and only 4 (3.7%) necessitated lensectomy due to impairment of the visual axis. Although no eyes were noted to have nuclear sclerosis postoperatively, small amounts of nuclear sclerosis may have been overlooked because of our assessment technique.
In the past, vitreous surgery for ROP was performed via an open sky or a pars plicata approach with lensectomy. The rationale was that the position of the infant crystalline lens precluded adequate access to the vitreous. Also, the pars plana is not fully developed until a corrected age of approximately 6 to 12 months.27,28 With the advent of LSV,1 management of postequatorial disease without the potentially amblyogenic lensectomy procedure and minimal postoperative cataractogenesis may be feasible.1,3
We believe that the same surgical principles apply in our procedure as they do in 2-port LSV, with the exception that we sew in an infusion cannula at the pars plicata to sustain continuous infusion throughout the procedure. By doing so, there is potentially decreased risk of hypotony throughout the procedure, particularly when instrumentation is interchanged between the 2 active sclerotomy sites. Switching hands during the procedure has the added benefit of avoiding crossing the midline during vitreous and membrane dissection, thus potentially avoiding lens trauma. The potential avoidance of transient hypotony may also have minimal but important effects on the chamber stability and view of the posterior segment throughout the procedure. Finally, closure may be facilitated with a potential lower risk of hypotony by closing the infusion line last, thus often negating the need to reinject soft eyes after closure with 2 sclerotomy sites.
All postoperative cataracts in the study were secondary to a known pathogenic mechanism: 3 eyes had instrument-lens apposition, 1 eye had retina-lens apposition, and in the remaining 2 eyes, long-acting tamponade was probably the cause of the cataract. In numerous instances, instrument-lens apposition and retina-lens apposition did not lead to cataractous changes following vitrectomy. This seems to further the belief that the infantile lens is somewhat resistant to metabolic and mechanical insult. Cataractogenesis was seen more frequently in the stage 4B group, probably because the procedure typically involves more extensive surgical dissection of vitreous membranes. Finally, hydrostatic forces from the infusion cannula appeared to have been well tolerated.
One of the weaknesses of our study may be that we did not incorporate a standardized cataract grading system, as has been used in adults.29,30 Another potential weakness may be that an indirect ophthalmoscope and 25-diopter lens were used for grading the anterior segment changes. Unfortunately, examination of an infant lens for every visit precludes slitlamp examination even under optimal circumstances. Earlier studies1,3 assessing lens clarity used a similar method of examination because of such limitations. The possibility of missing subtle changes by not using a slitlamp certainly exists. However, we are confident that visually significant lens opacities were detected with high sensitivity by our examination technique. These visually significant opacities have the most impact during the critical phase of visual development. Subtle nuclear changes that develop more slowly, although important, may have less impact on eventual functional outcome in these children. Additional follow-up studies on this cohort are warranted to look for late nuclear cataracts. Based on our results, our data suggest that 3-port LSV maintains lens clarity during the critical early stages of visual development for the vast majority of eyes with stages 4A and 4B detachments secondary to ROP.
Correspondence: Eric R. Holz, MD, Department of Ophthalmology, Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, 6565 Fannin St, Room NC-205, Houston, TX 77030 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Submitted for Publication: December 16, 2004; final revision received March 7, 2005; accepted March 10, 2005.
Financial Disclosure: None.
Funding/Support: This study was supported in part by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc, New York, NY.
Thank you for submitting a comment on this article. It will be reviewed by JAMA Ophthalmology editors. You will be notified when your comment has been published. Comments should not exceed 500 words of text and 10 references.
Do not submit personal medical questions or information that could identify a specific patient, questions about a particular case, or general inquiries to an author. Only content that has not been published, posted, or submitted elsewhere should be submitted. By submitting this Comment, you and any coauthors transfer copyright to the journal if your Comment is posted.
* = Required Field
Disclosure of Any Conflicts of Interest*
Indicate all relevant conflicts of interest of each author below, including all relevant financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including, but not limited to, employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speakers’ bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued. If all authors have none, check "No potential conflicts or relevant financial interests" in the box below. Please also indicate any funding received in support of this work. The information will be posted with your response.
Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more
Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features
Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)
Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours
Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.
Download citation file:
Web of Science® Times Cited: 4
Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.
and access these and other features:
Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a link to reset your password.
Enter your username and email address. We'll send instructions on how to reset your password to the email address we have on record.
Athens and Shibboleth are access management services that provide single sign-on to protected resources. They replace the multiple user names and passwords necessary to access subscription-based content with a single user name and password that can be entered once per session. It operates independently of a user's location or IP address. If your institution uses Athens or Shibboleth authentication, please contact your site administrator to receive your user name and password.