0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.242.8.162. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
Correspondence |

Intravitreal Triamcinolone in Diabetic Macular Edema—Reply

Jost B. Jonas, MD; Peter Martus, PhD; Robert F. Degenring, MD; Ingrid Kreissig, MD; Imren Akkoyun, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(10):1507. doi:10.1001/archopht.124.10.1507-a.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

In reply

We would like to thank Mr Aslam and colleagues for their interest in our study.1 We agree that the follow-up was not complete, as at 9 months after the injection, data were available for only 8 patients. This incomplete follow-up is, without doubt, a limitation of the study. However, because the increase in visual acuity after an intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide usually takes place within 4 weeks after the intervention and because the main purpose of the study was to assess factors associated with the increase in visual acuity, the loss of patients mainly at the end of follow-up might not have markedly influenced the conclusions drawn. We also agree with Mr Aslam and colleagues that the grading system of macula edema, such as the use of standard nonstereoscopic photographs, a single examiner, and the combination of the categories 0 to 2, 3 to 4, and 5 to 6 for statistical analysis, had its limitations. However, because there is no universally accepted grading system for macular edema, we chose the system described in the study. Examination by an experienced single examiner may be better than examination by 2 moderately trained examiners, even if the examination by 2 examiners allows for the calculation of an interobserver variation. Although Figure 2 contains only 32 squares, it represents the data of all of the 53 eyes included in the study. The reason for the lower number of squares in Figure 2 than eyes included in the study is that some squares represent the data of 2 or more eyes. As explained in the legend of Figure 2, the scattergram shows the correlation between the preinjection visual acuity and the best postoperative visual acuity during follow-up. It does not refer to a specific date during follow-up. The ordinate unit in Figure 1 is visual acuity for which the visual acuity measurements obtained on Snellen charts were converted to Snellen lines. A peak in the figure therefore indicates an improvement in visual acuity. The mean maximal visual acuity during follow-up was the highest visual acuity measurement obtained at any point during the entire follow-up. It may have been at the first month after the injection for one eye and at the second month after the injection for the other eye. The mean visual acuity measurements at specific dates after the injection are given in Figure 1.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

First Page Preview

View Large
/>
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign in

Create a free personal account to sign up for alerts, share articles, and more.

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();