We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Correspondence |

Comparing Contact Lens and Refractive Surgery Risks—Reply

William D. Mathers, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(6):854-855. doi:10.1001/archopht.125.6.854.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In reply

Our preliminary analysis questioned whether refractive surgery may be as safe, or even safer, than long-term contact lens wear. It is not a simple question. We are stymied by the lack of adequate data to assess the risks of either refractive surgery or contact lens use. The large contact lens studies do not report final visual acuity or the incidence of corneal transplantation following infections. The US military refractive study is a good start but is not large or broad enough to answer the questions definitively either. Broader information on refractive outcomes may be glimpsed from recent eye bank data on corneal transplantations performed for vision loss related to refractive surgery. These data reflect the broad spectrum of problems across the country but likely include many older patients who have undergone radial keratotomy. In 2004, the first year for which we have data, 46 of 31 139 transplantations were performed for refractive surgery complications in the United States. During that same year, there were nearly 1 400 000 refractive procedures performed, 1 corneal transplantation for every 32 000 refractive procedures. These numbers are rough approximations, but they still provide a ballpark figure for the whole country that is in line with our previous estimates.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles