0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

A Retrospective Look at Prospective Investigations

Simmons Lessell, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(7):965. doi:10.1001/archopht.125.7.965.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

Even a perfunctory comparison between the leading American ophthalmology journals of today and those of only 25 years ago reveals striking differences. The dearth of female authors (and editorial board members) has to a great extent been redressed, and there has been a remarkable increase in the prevalence of authors with non-European surnames. Current journals are more cosmopolitan, with many valuable articles contributed from previously underrepresented regions of the world. However, one of the most important changes in content is the increased proportion of articles describing the results of collaborative, multi-institutional, prospective investigations designed to evaluate the treatment or epidemiology of specific diseases. While many treatment trials have industrial sponsors, the National Eye Institute is probably the main source of support for these large-scale prospective ophthalmic investigations. During the last 25 years, the National Eye Institute dedicated nearly $700 million (about 10% of the extramural budget of the institute) to support these studies.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

21 Views
0 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();