We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Premises, Promises Performance Measures in Health Care

George R. Beauchamp, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(11):1566-1567. doi:10.1001/archopht.125.11.1566.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


There is an emerging sense of “knowing” that American health care is in dire straits. Two premises underlying this belief are driving change: that the system is too expensive and too dangerous. The proof of the first premise is generally proffered by observations that there are too many uninsured Americans, and most of the remainder are increasingly burdened by inexorable increases in the cost of care. Proof of the second seems to derive from reports of medical ineffectiveness and error, such as the report of the Institute of Medicine. In apparent response comes expanded interest in “performance measures” and appraisal. To effect improvement in performance, 2 significant trends are emerging: renewed interest in technology, particularly the electronic medical record (EMR), and accountability among medical providers (witness the calls from Congress for provider proof of “quality indicators” in return for maintaining reimbursement rates for services). These premises are intertwined. The promises implied are that health care will become more accessible and effective if change is accepted. Let us examine these premises in light of the promises and the likely consequential prospects.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Diabetes, Foot Ulcer

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy