0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Technology and Retinopathy of Prematurity Diagnosis The New Frontier

William V. Good, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(11):1562-1563. doi:10.1001/archopht.125.11.1562.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

Clinicians who diagnose retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) find themselves in a nearly perfect storm of converging negative influences. The goal to promptly diagnose prethreshold ROP has resulted in more frequent examinations for some infants. Meanwhile, in many regions of the United States, pediatric ophthalmology is underserved because too few ophthalmology residents choose pediatrics as a subspecialty. Some medium-sized cities must import ROP experts because none are locally available. Screening for ROP can be hazardous to the ophthalmologist. Failure to adequately follow up infants at risk for ROP can result in very large malpractice settlements. Nuances and subtleties that surround the management of adverse-outcome cases are too often debated in court and not in a scientific venue. Reimbursement for examinations barely covers overhead in some situations. Infants' parents may disappear, miss follow-up appointments, and even change the last name of their infant, stressing the efforts of the doctor's office to find and schedule children for ROP examinations after they are discharged from the hospital.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

63 Views
3 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();