Controversies |

The Case Against the Use of Steroids in the Treatment of Bacterial Keratitis

Elisabeth J. Cohen, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(1):103-104. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.503.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


For 50 years, the debate for and against the use of topical steroids in the treatment of bacterial keratitis has raged. Today it is as controversial as ever. Kirk Wilhelmus, MD, has advanced the subject and helped me with this article by doing an excellent literature review of the subject in his article “Indecision About Corticosteroids for Bacterial Keratitis: An Evidence-Based Update.”1 I still agree with the quotation he cites by Thygeson, published originally in 1953, that “great care should be examined in the use of cortisone and hydrocortisone in central corneal ulcers and that bacteriologic diagnosis should be made before employment of these hormones.”1(p839) Evidence and experience suggest that even after the results of cultures and sensitivities are known, one should be especially cautious in the use of topical steroids in the treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. I think the anti-inflammatory effects of antibiotics (a phrase I learned from Jules Baum, MD, when I was a corneal fellow) are frequently sufficient in the treatment of bacterial corneal ulcers.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
Visual Recovery in Treated Bacterial Keratitis. Ophthalmology Published online Mar 5, 2014.;
Visual outcomes in treated bacterial keratitis: four years of prospective follow-up. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Published online Mar 11, 2014.;