0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Continuing Medical Education, Physicians, and Pavlov Can We Change What Happens When Industry Rings the Bell?

Paul R. Lichter, MD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(11):1593-1597. doi:10.1001/archopht.126.11.1593.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

“The traditional independence of physicians and the welfare of the public are being threatened by the new vogue among drug manufacturers to promote their products by assuming an aggressive role in the ‘education’ of doctors.”1 Although written nearly half a century ago, this comment is worth considering today, especially as it pertains to continuing medical education (CME).

We commonly invoke CME to mean something good and something needed. In many ways, we seem to respond to it with a conditioned, Pavlovian response. Continuing medical education helps assure us and our patients that we are up to date in a fast-changing medical environment. The number of CME offerings grows annually. Yet, while it grows, much has transpired in the CME field to turn it on its head. Physician-industry relationships in CME have led to a creeping skepticism about how CME is planned and financed. Questions are being asked about the teachers and their sponsors and objectivity, which is taking its toll on physician credibility. How did this happen? What is fueling it? Perhaps CME's physician-participants and teachers have lost their way. If so, what can be done to restore them to their former respectability?

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

71 Views
5 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();