We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Controversies |

Pediatric Refractive Surgery Review

George O. Waring III, MD, FRCOphth
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(6):814-815. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.94.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Brown1and Tychsen2convey their disparate viewpoints about refractive surgery in children but agree on some common premises:

  • Spectacle and contact lens intolerance are requisite before any refractive surgery.

  • Refractive surgeons should collaborate with pediatric ophthalmologists—and in more complex cases, pediatricians—to refine clinical measurement and assessment before and after surgery; provide helpful guidance for management, such as the treatment of amblyopia; and sustain broader support for the family and other caretakers, including the refractive surgeon.

  • The precision of visual results achievable with refractive surgery in adults who can fixate during diagnostic testing and surgery cannot be achieved in children.

  • An overriding outcome variable is the change in the child's binocular visual function in everyday life, in addition to standard visual acuity and refractive measures. Their improved vision should enhance their visual awareness, decrease their tentativeness in life, and expand their social interactions.

  • Each author avoids defining the pediatric age group, and the reader is left to assume that they are referring to preteens, since refractive surgery in teenagers (with its inevitable retreatments) is becoming more accepted by refractive surgeons.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

6 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Pretest Probabilities and Likelihood Ratios for Clinical Findings