We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Use of Global Visual Acuity Data in a Time Trade-off Approach to Calculate the Cost Utility of Cataract Surgery Methodological Issues of Cost-Utility Comparisons

Kevin D. Frick, PhD; Robert W. Massof, PhD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(9):1205-1206. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.236.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Cost-effectiveness studies in health care inform policy decisions, particularly with respect to allocation of health care resources. For example, if the number of cataract surgeries performed is limited by the availability of surgeons, a policy maker may have to choose between paying for surgery of 1 eye only, to maximize the number of people who can have surgery, or paying for surgery in both eyes, to maximize the benefit of surgery to each individual. In another example, a program manager at a foundation might have to choose between funding a cataract surgery project in country A or funding a child vaccination program in country B. To make rational and defensible decisions, policy makers must use the same decision criterion for all choices to compare outcomes in a common measurement unit. The work by Lansingh and Carter1 in this issue of the Archives examines the cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery around the world. The article raises a series of interesting methodological issues that can influence future cost-effectiveness studies related to eye care.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

2 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Surgical repair of large cyclodialysis clefts. Eur J Ophthalmol Published online Sep 13, 2016;