We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Progressive Optic Disc Change Implications for Clinical Practice and Trial Design

Balwantray C. Chauhan, PhD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(10):1382-1383. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.281.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Ocular hypertensive patients without convincing evidence of glaucomatous visual field defects with standard automated perimetry often present a dilemma for clinicians. After 5 years of follow-up the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study showed that while reducing intraocular pressure (IOP) halved the relative risk of developing glaucoma (from 9.5% to 4.4%), the absolute risk reduction was only 5%, with around 90% of the subjects randomized to only observation not developing glaucoma.1 The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study demonstrated the potent role of IOP in the development of glaucoma, yet it also highlighted that risk profiling for factors in addition to IOP was necessary to more accurately predict which subjects were likely to develop glaucoma and who required change in management, especially regarding treatment and frequency of follow-up. We have subsequently learned that older age, larger vertical cup-disc ratio, increased pattern standard deviation, and thinner central corneal thickness are additional risk factors,2,3 and efforts have been made to develop and validate risk models in ocular hypertension.38


optic disk

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis