0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Small Case Series |

Interface Wavelike Deposits After Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty FREE

George D. Kymionis, MD, PhD; Takeshi Ide, MD, PhD; Sonia H. Yoo, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Section Editor: W. Richard Green, MD

More Author Information
Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(10):1389-1390. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.249.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) is a new treatment option for corneal endothelial dysfunction. Compared with penetrating keratoplasty, DSAEK is less invasive and leads to more rapid visual recovery.

The most common complications after DSAEK described in the literature are graft detachment and/or dislocation, rejection, epithelial ingrowth, and pupillary block, all of which can lead to graft failure.13

Interface corneal deposits and/or debris have been described after laser in situ keratomileusis but have not been associated with DSAEK.4,5In this case series, we describe 2 patients after DSAEK with the appearance of characteristic wavelike deposit accumulation at the donor-recipient interface in the immediate postoperative period.

REPORT OF CASES

Patients were asked to sign an informed consent form prior to treatment. Institutional review board approval was obtained before medical record review. The operations were successful and without complications in both cases. The precut lamellar corneal DSAEK grafts were provided by eye banks. The DSAEK donor tissues were prepared using a Moria (Antony, France) automated microkeratome and a Moria artificial chamber. Optisol GS solution (Bausch & Lomb Surgical, Irvine, California) was used as storage medium. The folded donor tissues were grasped gently using angled nonappositional forceps (Charlie forcep; Moria) and inserted into the eye. Venting incisions were made to remove interface fluid.

Case 1

A 73-year-old female patient with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and pseudophakia had DSAEK for bullous keratopathy. Preoperatively, the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) in this eye was 20/70. On postoperative day 1, characteristic interface wavelike deposit accumulation was visible on slitlamp examination despite corneal edema. The deposits were limited to the interface between the recipient cornea and lenticular lamellar corneal graft, without anterior or posterior extension. There was no anterior chamber reaction noted. As the corneal edema resolved, the deposits became more prominent on slitlamp examination (Figure 1). Subjectively, the patient denied any associated symptoms. A short trial of intensive steroids (from 4 times initially to 8 times per day) was tried without any evidence of deposit appearance.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Case 1. Slitlamp biomicroscopy revealed significant characteristic interface wavelike deposit accumulation.

Graphic Jump Location

At the 3-month postoperative examination, the interface deposits remained stable. Despite complete resolution of the corneal edema, the patient's uncorrected and BSCVAs did not improve (20/70). One year after DSAEK, the interface deposits remained unchanged and there was no improvement in the patient's visual acuity.

Case 2

An 88-year-old man with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy had DSAEK in the left eye for bullous keratopathy after cataract surgery and trabeculectomy in 1997. Preoperatively, the BSCVA in this eye was 20/200. On the first postoperative day, characteristic interface wavelike deposit accumulation was visualized on slitlamp examination despite corneal edema (Figure 2). A short trial of intensive steroids (from 4 times initially to 8 times per day) was tried without any evidence of deposit appearance. No evidence of interface fluid was found using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (Visante; Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, California).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Case 2. Interface wavelike deposits accumulate immediately (A) and 1 month after (B) Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.

Graphic Jump Location

At the 1-year follow-up examination, interface deposits remained stable. Despite complete resolution of the corneal edema, the patient's uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity did not improve (20/200).

COMMENT

In this case series, we present a post-DSAEK complication that has not previously been described in the literature. Characteristic interface accumulation of wavelike deposits without anterior or posterior extension were present in both patients immediately after DSAEK. The patients' uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuities remained unchanged (compared with preoperative measurements), even after corneal edema had resolved.

The morphologic features, distribution, and density of these particles remained unaltered throughout the 1-year postoperative observation period. The etiology of these deposits is uncertain. Initially, the possibility of an infectious etiology, intralamellar keratitis, or the development of epithelial downgrowth at the interface space were considered. However, the immediate appearance of the deposits on postoperative day 1, wide extension of the deposits, absence of anterior chamber reaction, lack of improvement after an intensive course of steroids, and unaltered appearance at follow-up visits supported an noninfectious etiology and excluded the possibility of epithelial downgrowth.

Precipitates from the storage media may be a possible source of these deposits/debris. In addition, talc from surgical gloves has been associated with particle deposition. Another possible source is microkeratome or blade debris. Previous studies during laser in situ keratomileusis have demonstrated that the oscillating microkeratome and blade could produce debris that remains at the flap interface.4,5However, these interface deposits did not significantly affect corneal wound healing and remained unreactive and stable during the follow-up periods. The uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuities of both patients were significantly affected, showing no postoperative improvement. In these cases, meticulous rinsing of the stromal interface after flap creation in the eye banks or before injection into the anterior chamber may minimize deposit accumulation.

A major limitation of this study is the lack of confocal or tissue microscopy analysis of the deposits. Future studies including these analyses are needed to elucidate the origin of these deposits.

In conclusion, interface wavelike deposits are an infrequent post-DSAEK complication that could affect patients' final visual outcome. Surgeons and eye banks should be aware of the possibility of this complication after DSAEK.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Correspondence: Dr Kymionis, Institute of Vision and Optics, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Crete Medical School, 71110 Heraklion, Crete, Greece (kymionis@med.uoc.gr).

Financial Disclosures: None reported.

REFERENCES

Kymionis  GDSuh  LHDubovy  SRYoo  SH Diagnosis of residual Descemet's membrane after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33 (7) 1322- 1324
PubMed Link to Article
Busin  MBhatt  PR Late detachment of donor graft after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34 (1) 159- 160
PubMed Link to Article
Terry  MAShamie  NChen  ESHoar  KLFriend  DJ Endothelial keratoplasty: a simplified technique to minimize graft dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure, and pupillary block. Ophthalmology 2008;115 (7) 1179- 1186
PubMed Link to Article
Ivarsen  AThogersen  JKeiding  SRHjortdal  JOMoller-Pedersen  T Plastic particles at the LASIK interface. Ophthalmology 2004;111 (1) 18- 23
PubMed Link to Article
Hirst  LWVandeleur  KW  Jr Laser in situ keratomileusis interface deposits. J Refract Surg 1998;14 (6) 653- 654
PubMed

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Case 1. Slitlamp biomicroscopy revealed significant characteristic interface wavelike deposit accumulation.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Case 2. Interface wavelike deposits accumulate immediately (A) and 1 month after (B) Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Kymionis  GDSuh  LHDubovy  SRYoo  SH Diagnosis of residual Descemet's membrane after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33 (7) 1322- 1324
PubMed Link to Article
Busin  MBhatt  PR Late detachment of donor graft after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34 (1) 159- 160
PubMed Link to Article
Terry  MAShamie  NChen  ESHoar  KLFriend  DJ Endothelial keratoplasty: a simplified technique to minimize graft dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure, and pupillary block. Ophthalmology 2008;115 (7) 1179- 1186
PubMed Link to Article
Ivarsen  AThogersen  JKeiding  SRHjortdal  JOMoller-Pedersen  T Plastic particles at the LASIK interface. Ophthalmology 2004;111 (1) 18- 23
PubMed Link to Article
Hirst  LWVandeleur  KW  Jr Laser in situ keratomileusis interface deposits. J Refract Surg 1998;14 (6) 653- 654
PubMed

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

518 Views
10 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs