0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Research Letters |

Intraocular Pressure Elevation During Radioactive Plaque Brachytherapy for Uveal Melanoma FREE

Sandeep K. Bhatia, MD; Douglas J. Covert, MD, MPH; William J. Wirostko, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Retina Service of the Eye Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.


Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(5):664-676. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.94.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignant neoplasm in adults, with an average incidence of 6 cases per 1 million people per year.1 The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study has shown that radioactive iodine 125 plaque brachytherapy offers equivalent survival compared with enucleation.2 While allowing preservation of the eye, brachytherapy has many potential complications, including dry eye, cataract, radiation retinopathy and optic neuropathy, glaucoma, and vision loss.3 To our knowledge, intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation during brachytherapy has not been previously described. The purpose of this investigation was to quantify the IOP changes during brachytherapy. Based on clinical experience, we speculated that the IOP would increase during brachytherapy and that older age, presence of glaucoma or diabetes mellitus (DM), larger radiation doses, larger tumor size, lack of rectus muscle disinsertion, and anterior tumor location may be associated with larger IOP elevations.

This was a retrospective record review of all patients undergoing Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study–style brachytherapy at the Eye Institute of the Medical College of Wisconsin between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2007. Institutional review board approval was obtained. Patients were identified by billing record search. Exclusion criteria included being younger than 18 years, having nonmelanotic tumors, and having incomplete medical documentation. The following data were gathered: preoperative IOP, age, sex, history of DM or glaucoma, tumor location and height, radiation dose, plaque diameter, daily IOP during brachytherapy, muscle disinsertion, and use of topical antiglaucoma medications.

Of 113 patients identified as having uveal melanoma, 40 were excluded owing to incomplete records. There were 33 men and 40 women. The mean (SD) age was 61.9 (15.7) years. One patient had open-angle glaucoma, no patients had ocular hypertension, and 12 patients had DM.

Three IOP variables were constructed: a preoperative IOP composite for each patient, defined as the average of preoperative IOP measurements (≤3 measurements); delta IOP (ΔIOP), or the change in IOP as measured on a perioperative day minus the preoperative composite; and the maximum ΔIOP (ΔIOPmax) for each patient.

The mean preoperative IOP composite was 16.0 mm Hg. This was statistically different from the mean IOPmax of 24.3 mm Hg during brachytherapy (P < .001) but not statistically different from the mean IOP of 15.5 mm Hg 1 day after plaque removal (P = .24) (Figure). The mean (SD) ΔIOPmax during plaque therapy was 8.5 (6.0) mm Hg. This was not statistically different for tumors at the posterior pole, midperiphery, and ciliary body (P = .15). Using a linear regression model, there was no relationship between tumor height and ΔIOPmax (P = .53) or between the mean total radiation dose and ΔIOPmax (P = .46). There was limited correlation between plaque diameter and ΔIOPmax using a linear regression model (r2 = 0.07; P = .02). The ΔIOPmax for patients with DM was not statistically different from the ΔIOPmax for those without DM (P = .40). Eighteen patients with extraocular muscle disinsertion did not have statistically different ΔIOPmax compared with 55 patients without extraocular muscle disinsertion (P = .72).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.

Variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) from preoperative measurement throughout brachytherapy and postoperative measurements. Error bars indicate standard errors of the means.

Graphic Jump Location

This study demonstrated a statistically significant trend of increased IOP of 8 mm Hg in eyes treated with Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study–style iodine 125 brachytherapy that persisted while the plaque was in place but resolved by the first postoperative day. Ten patients (14%) experienced IOP increases of 15 mm Hg or more, and 23 (32%) required topical hypotensive therapy. These medications may minimize the IOP elevation associated with brachytherapy. Factors such as age, DM, plaque size or location, tumor height, and radiation dose do not serve as reliable indicators of who will experience these marked elevations in IOP. Given the number experiencing moderate IOP elevation and our inability to identify these patients preoperatively, regular IOP monitoring may be advisable for patients while undergoing iodine 125 brachytherapy.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Correspondence: Dr Wirostko, Retina Service of the Eye Institute, Medical College of Wisconsin, 925 N 87th St, Milwaukee, WI 53226 (wirostko@mcw.edu).

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This research was supported in part by the Heed Ophthalmic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, and by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, New York.

Scotto  JFraumeni  JF  JrLee  JAH Melanomas of the eye and other noncutaneous sites: epidemiologic aspects. J Natl Cancer Inst 1976;56 (3) 489- 491
PubMed
Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group, The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma, V: twelve-year mortality rates and prognostic factors: COMS report No. 28. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124 (12) 1684- 1693
PubMed Link to Article
Schocket  LSFine  SL Choroidal melanoma update: Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) results. Marcus  DMFocal Points Clinical Modules for Ophthalmologists. San Francisco, CA American Academy of Ophthalmology2005;1- 14

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.

Variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) from preoperative measurement throughout brachytherapy and postoperative measurements. Error bars indicate standard errors of the means.

Graphic Jump Location

Tables

References

Scotto  JFraumeni  JF  JrLee  JAH Melanomas of the eye and other noncutaneous sites: epidemiologic aspects. J Natl Cancer Inst 1976;56 (3) 489- 491
PubMed
Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group, The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma, V: twelve-year mortality rates and prognostic factors: COMS report No. 28. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124 (12) 1684- 1693
PubMed Link to Article
Schocket  LSFine  SL Choroidal melanoma update: Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) results. Marcus  DMFocal Points Clinical Modules for Ophthalmologists. San Francisco, CA American Academy of Ophthalmology2005;1- 14

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

535 Views
5 Citations
×

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles
Jobs