0
Correspondence |

Compliance With Amblyopia Therapy

Merrick Moseley, PhD; Alistair Fielder, FRCOphth; Catherine Stewart, BMedSci
[+] Author Affiliations

Copyright 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

More Author Information
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(8):1226-1226. doi:
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Mintz-Hittner and Fernandez1 contribute to the debate concerning the influence of age on treatment outcome in amblyopia. They report significant improvements in the visual acuity of 36 children between the ages of 7.0 and 10.3 years undergoing occlusion or penalization therapy. These are heartening results but are not unexpected; we now know that even adults with amblyopia demonstrate residual plasticity of the visual system.2 Levi's remark3 that failure to achieve improvement in the older amblyopic child may "reflect the very real difficulties in maintaining patient (or clinician) motivation or the failure to use the most efficacious treatment modalities" now appears apposite.

Successful treatment prompts us to inquire what specific factors contribute to its effectiveness. Here the authors' views are made clear from the pithy subtitle of their article: "Compliance Cures." Unfortunately, at no point do they mention how the presumed good compliance was actually assessed (although we note the use of "several methods of coercion and bribery" as a means of compliance enhancement). We suspect that as far as occlusion is concerned, only subjective recording methods were employed, on which it is difficult to place numerical confidence limits. In these circumstances, we would urge caution in making bold assertions regarding the relationship between compliance and treatment outcome. We learned this lesson when assuming excellent compliance on the part of a child who made clinically significant gains in visual function while undergoing minimal occlusion. We subsequently discovered that objectively measured compliance was less than 50%.4

Several different means of objectively monitoring compliance4 5 are now available, which provide the opportunity to move away from a conception of compliance as a subjective, often binary attribute to one in which it is an objectively measured, quantitative variable. This should allow us to define empirically a dose-response function for occlusion therapy. In other words, we will be able to determine as a function of age, severity, and type of amblyopia how much occlusion a child is likely to require, rather than relying on ad hoc prescribing regimens.

REFERENCES

Mintz-Hittner  HA, Fernandez  KM. Successful amblyopia therapy initiated after age 7 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;1181535- 1541
Levi  DM, Polat  U, Hu  YS. Improvement in Vernier acuity in adults with amblyopia: practice makes better. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;381493- 1510
Levi  DM. Pathophysiology of binocular vision and amblyopia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1994;53- 10
CrossRef
Fielder  AR, Irwin  M, Auld  R, Cocker  KD, Jones  HS, Moseley  MJ. Compliance in amblyopia therapy: objective monitoring of occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79585- 589
CrossRef
Simonsz  HJ, Polling  JR, Voorn  R.  et al.  Electronic monitoring of treatment compliance in patching for amblyopia. Strabismus. 1999;7113- 123
CrossRef

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Mintz-Hittner  HA, Fernandez  KM. Successful amblyopia therapy initiated after age 7 years. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;1181535- 1541
Levi  DM, Polat  U, Hu  YS. Improvement in Vernier acuity in adults with amblyopia: practice makes better. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;381493- 1510
Levi  DM. Pathophysiology of binocular vision and amblyopia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1994;53- 10
CrossRef
Fielder  AR, Irwin  M, Auld  R, Cocker  KD, Jones  HS, Moseley  MJ. Compliance in amblyopia therapy: objective monitoring of occlusion. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79585- 589
CrossRef
Simonsz  HJ, Polling  JR, Voorn  R.  et al.  Electronic monitoring of treatment compliance in patching for amblyopia. Strabismus. 1999;7113- 123
CrossRef

Correspondence

CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.