0
Laboratory Sciences |

Hyperfractionated External Beam Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Murine Transgenic Retinoblastoma FREE

Brandy C. Hayden, BS; Timothy G. Murray, MD; Nicole Cicciarelli; Ingrid U. Scott, MD, MPH; Anastassia Alexandridou, MD; Eleut Hernandez, LAT; Xiaodong Wu, PhD; Arnold M. Markoe, MD; William Feuer, MS; Lilia Fulton, BA; Joan M. O'Brien, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Copyright 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

More Author Information
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(3):353-359. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.3.353
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Objective  To determine the in vivo efficacy of hyperfractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in comparison with standard daily EBRT in a murine model of heritable retinoblastoma.

Methods  Two hundred twenty eyes from 6-week-old simian virus-40 large T-antigen–positive mice were treated with a total dose of EBRT ranging from 10-76 Gy (1000 to 7600 rad). One hundred ten eyes underwent EBRT administered in 2.0-Gy (200-rad) fractions once per day. Forty-two eyes received hyperfractionated EBRT administered in 1.2-Gy (120-rad) fractions twice per day, while 48 eyes received EBRT twice daily in fractions of 5.0 Gy (500 rad). Twenty eyes served as untreated controls. All eyes were obtained for histopathologic examination and graded positive if any tumor was present.

Results  A dose-dependent inhibition of ocular tumor was observed for EBRT in these transgenic retinoblastoma mice. The tumor control dose for 50% of eyes(TCD50) treated with 2.0 Gy fractions of EBRT was 45 Gy (4500 rad) when treatments were administered once daily. A significant increase in tumor control was observed when treatments were administered twice per day at fractions of 1.2 Gy, resulting in a TCD50 of 33 Gy (3300 rad) (P = .003). A further increase in tumor control was observed when twice-daily EBRT was administered in 5.0 Gy fractions resulting in a TCD50of 28 Gy (2800 rad).

Conclusions  Hyperfractionated EBRT safely and effectively controls intraocular retinoblastoma in this transgenic animal model. Use of hyperfractionation allows for a reduction in total radiation delivered dose, while shortening the total treatment time.

Clinical Relevance  This treatment approach may be applicable in the management of pediatric retinoblastoma by maintaining excellent tumor control, while reducing treatment-associated complications.

Figures in this Article

RETINOBLASTOMA, arising from embryonic photoreceptor cells in the eye, is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in childhood.1 - 2 Children with a germline RB gene mutation are predisposed to bilateral eye involvement and a lifetime predilection for cancer involvement.3 - 5

Recent evidence suggests an increase in the incidence of retinoblastoma during the last 40 years, possibly because of more successful methods of treatment resulting in improved patient survival and/or increased mutation rates.6 Current treatment methods include enucleation, scleral plaque irradiation, cryotherapy, photocoagulation, external beam radiotherapy(EBRT), chemotherapy, and combined therapeutic modalities.2 ,7 - 8

Retinoblastoma is a highly radiosensitive tumor and can be effectively treated with ionizing EBRT.9 - 11 In the past, EBRT was administered most commonly to children with bilateral retinoblastoma that was untreatable with local therapies.12 This treatment modality was generally preferred if a tumor was larger than 15 mm in diameter, if it was located adjacent to the optic disc or fovea, if multiple tumors were present, or if extensive vitreous seeding of tumor cells was noted.9 Failures of EBRT leading to enucleation were often due to progression of vitreous seeds, recurrences from previously existing tumors, or the development of new intraocular tumors.13

Although EBRT has been shown to improve ocular and visual prognosis in retinoblastoma survivors, it is associated with multiple complications.14 - 18 Current concerns related to the application of radiotherapy in the treatment of retinoblastoma have focused on delayed complications including radiation-enhanced second tumor risk for children with RB1 germline mutations, radiation related midface hypoplasia, cataract and, rarely, radiation vasculopathy or optic neuropathy.19 - 21

Hyperfractionated radiotherapy may offer the potential for effective treatment, while minimizing toxicity and lowering the risk of secondary malignancy. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy involves the delivery of an increased number of fractional radiation doses of smaller than conventional size in an overall treatment time comparable with, or shorter than, that required for conventional EBRT.22 It has demonstrated increased tumor control in other pediatric tumors.23 - 25 Studies of pediatric acute myeloblastic leukemia demonstrated that tumor control could be achieved at lower total treatment doses when twice vs once-daily treatment was used. 26 - 28 Hyperfractionated radiation therapy was also found to be effective in the treatment of medulloblastoma, ependymomas, and rhabdomyosarcoma.25 ,29 - 33

In the current study, a transgenic mouse model of heritable retinoblastoma was used to evaluate the in vivo efficacy of twice-daily hyperfractionated EBRT (1.2- and 5.0-Gy [120- and 500-rad] fractions) compared with treatment delivered once per day (2.0-Gy [200-rad] fractions).

The study protocol was approved by the University of Miami School of Medicine Animal Care and Use Review Board, Miami, Fla. All experiments in this study were conducted in accordance with the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology guidelines for the use of animals in ophthalmologic and vision research.

Two hundred twenty simian virus-40 large T-antigen transgene-bearing mice were treated, as described below, beginning at 6 weeks of age. Transgenic animals were identified through polymerase chain reaction analysis of tail DNA. Transgene-positive animals develop bilateral, heritable retinoblastoma that resembles human retinoblastoma. All animals were anesthetized with a combination of intraperitoneal ketamine hydrochloride and xylazine hydrochloride and topical proparacaine hydrochloride for the purpose of tail blood extraction. No anesthesia was required for EBRT.

ORBITAL EBRT

Two hundred twenty mouse eyes were treated, as described herein, with fractionated EBRT with the use of a 10-mV x-ray machine (Clinac-2100; Varian Medical Systems, Inc, Palo Alto, Calif). Animals were briefly immobilized for treatment in specially constructed cages and shielded to minimize radiation to the midline nonocular structures (Figure 1). Animals were placed, head first, in the immobilization tube, treatment ports were confirmed, and radiation was delivered at 3.24 Gy/min(324 rad/min) to a field size of 7.0 Ă— 7.0 cm, with the heads of 4 mice radiated simultaneously. This treatment effectively focuses therapy to the orbit, while shielding nonocular midline structures. The total treatment doses ranged from 24-76 Gy (2400 to 7600 rad).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Midline shielding and immobilization apparatus for orbital external beam radiation therapy.

Grahic Jump Location

One hundred ten eyes underwent EBRT administered in 2.0-Gy fractions delivered once per day, 5 days per week. Forty-two eyes received EBRT twice per day, 5 days per week, in fractions of 1.2 Gy, while 48 eyes received similar treatment in fractions of 5.0 Gy. All radiation treatments delivered twice per day were administered 6 to 8 hours apart. An additional 20 eyes from simian virus-40 T-antigen–positive transgenic mice served as untreated controls.

HISTOPATHOLOGIC STUDY OF TRANSGENIC MICE

At 16 weeks of age, all animals were killed with an overdose of ketamine and xylazine. Both eyes were enucleated and immediately immersion-fixed in 10% formalin. The eyes were sectioned serially with 80-µm sections stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Light microscopic examination was performed on all histopathologic sections in a masked fashion. The eyes were graded positive for tumor development if any histopathologic evidence of tumor was present. Eyes were also evaluated for evidence of corneal, lenticular, retinal, or scleral toxic effects.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

To determine the dose-response relationships among the different EBRT fractionation schemes, the data from all experimental groups were combined and subjected to probit statistical analysis. Total radiation dose was entered as a linear predictor in a maximum likelihood probit regression model. The model was analyzed for goodness-of-fit, and logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the relationship between EBRT dose and tumor control.

All untreated control eyes exhibited large intraocular tumors (Figure 2). None of the eyes treated with a total radiation dose below 10 Gy (1000 rad) exhibited tumor control (Table 1).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Enucleated globe of a 16-week-old transgenic retinoblastoma mouse that received no treatment (control). Note large retinal tumor (original magnification Ă—7).

Grahic Jump Location
Table Grahic Jump LocationTumor Response for Each Subgroup of Conventional Single-Daily and Hyperfractionation Twice-Daily Therapy at Each Dose Fraction*

A dose-dependent inhibition of ocular tumor was observed for EBRT in these transgenic retinoblastoma mice at all treatment fractions and dosing strategies. Increasing the frequency of radiation treatment, while decreasing the fraction delivered per treatment, was significantly associated with increased tumor control when 1.2 Gy hyperfractionation was compared with 2.0 Gy conventional daily fractionation (Figure 3 and Figure 4). The tumor control dose for 50% of the eyes (TCD50) treated once daily with 2.0 Gy fractions was 45.0 Gy (4500 rad) at 16 weeks of age. The tumor control dose decreased to 33.9 Gy (3390 rad) for animals treated with radiation in 1.2-Gy fractions twice per day. Increasing the fractionated dose from 1.2-Gy to 5.0-Gy fractions twice per day further increased tumor control, resulting in a TCD50of 28.0 Gy (2800 rad). However, corneal and lenticular damage was observed in all of the eyes treated with these high-dose fractions of 5.0 Gy (Figure 5). None of the animals treated with dose fractions of either 2.0 or 1.2 Gy showed evidence of toxicity.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

Enucleated globes of transgenic mice after receiving external beam radiotherapy in 2.0-Gy (200-rad) fractions once per day. All eyes were enucleated at 16 weeks of age. A, Eye treated with a total dose of 24.0 Gy (2400 rad). Note that a large tumor is present. B, Eye treated with a total dose of 36.0 Gy (3600 rad). A moderate-sized tumor is present. C, Eye treated with a total dose of 48.0 Gy (4800 rad). Microscopic tumor is present. Note that no evidence of cataract, scleral thinning, corneal decompensation, or retinal abnormality is present (original magnificationĂ—7).

Grahic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.

Enucleated globes of transgenic mice after receiving external beam radiotherapy in 1.2-Gy (120-rad) fractions twice per day. All eyes were enucleated at 16 weeks of age. A, Eye treated with a total dose of 24.0 Gy (2400 rad). A small tumor is present. B, Eye receiving a total radiation dose of 33.6 Gy (3360 rad). Note the presence of microscopic tumor. C, Eye treated with a total dose of 48.0 Gy (4800 rad). Complete absence of tumor is demonstrated. No evidence of cataract or other toxic effect is present (original magnification Ă—7).

Grahic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 5.

Enucleated globes of transgenic mice after receiving external beam radiotherapy in 5.0-Gy (500-rad) fractions twice per day. All eyes were enucleated at 16 weeks of age. A, Eye treated with a total dose of 20.0 Gy (2000 rad). Note that trace tumor is present. B, Eye treated with a total dose of 30.0 Gy (3000 rad). Note complete absence of tumor. C, Eye treated with a total dose of 50.0 Gy (5000 rad). Note complete absence of tumor. Evidence of cataract, scleral thinning, and corneal decompensation are present (original magnification Ă—7).

Grahic Jump Location

Probit regression analysis was used for estimating the relationship between dose and tumor control, and logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the dose-response curves were significantly different among the 3 treatment groups (P = .003) (Figure 6).

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 6.

External beam radiation dose-response curves using probit analysis demonstrating the proportion of tumor-containing eyes controlled by fractionated radiation treatments by total treatment dose. Increasing treatment frequency from 2.0 Gy once daily to 1.2 Gy twice daily is associated with increased tumor control with a reduction in the tumor control dose for 50% of eyes. Tumor control can be further increased with the use of 5.0-Gy fractions twice daily; however, this dose is relatively toxic and, therefore, not clinically relevant. To convert gray to rad, multiply by 100.

Grahic Jump Location

External beam radiation therapy has been used for the treatment of retinoblastoma for more than 50 years. Focal delivery to the eye, new megavoltage machines, and lens-sparing techniques have contributed to the increasing efficacy of this treatment modality, improving ocular and visual prognoses, while decreasing treatment-related morbidities.34 The current study demonstrates that hyperfractionation (increasing the frequency of radiation treatment, while decreasing the fraction delivered per treatment) is significantly associated with increased tumor control in a murine transgenic model of retinoblastoma.

A wide range of EBRT dose fractionation schedules have been used previously in the management of childhood retinoblastoma; however, the choice has been largely empirical.13 ,35 - 36 Treatment variables have recently become more defined, with the most common fractionation schemes using fractions ranging from 1.8 Gy (180 rad) to 2.0 Gy administered once per day with total doses not exceeding 50.0 Gy. Radiation fractions greater than 2.0 Gy per treatment are potentially associated with severe ocular and periocular morbidity, particularly in eyes receiving concomitant chemotherapy. Total radiation doses exceeding 45.0 Gy may lead to lacrimal gland damage and decreased tear production. At total doses exceeding 50.0 Gy, radiation retinopathy may be seen.37

Despite the recent development of more defined treatment schedules, optimal dose-fractionation schedules are still unclear. The use of this unique mouse model of retinoblastoma has allowed for preclinical modeling of a variety of treatment regimens. As reported previously, the transgenic mouse model used in this study has histopathologic, immunocytochemical, electron microscopic, and clinical characteristics similar to those of human retinoblastoma. 38 - 41 In addition, the course of tumor development parallels that of human retinoblastoma.

Hyperfractionated radiotherapy refers to the delivery of an increased number of fractional radiation doses of smaller than conventional size in an overall treatment time comparable to, or shorter than, that required for conventional EBRT.22 Hyperfractionation is usually accomplished by delivering more than 1 fraction per day in sessions ranging from 4 to 8 hours apart. The rationale underlying the application of hyperfractionation is to exploit the differential radiosensitivities of the target volume tissues showing acute effects from those showing late effects, to decrease the rate of complications, while improving local tumor control.22 Radiosensitivity is related inversely to the degree of differentiation of the tissue and directly related to mitotic and mitochondrial activity.37 Although retinoblastoma has been characterized as a moderately well-differentiated tumor, it may be particularly susceptible to hyperfractionated EBRT because of the tumor's high mitotic activity.

A phase 1/2 study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of hyperfractionated radiotherapy in 136 children with poor-prognosis brainstem tumors.30 Children with brainstem tumors were treated with hyperfractionated EBRT at 1.1 Gy (110 rad) twice daily (minimum of 4-6 hours between fractions) to 66.0 Gy (6600 rad) in 6 weeks. Most patients(71% [24/34]) improved clinically during the course of treatment. This prompted a dose escalation from 66.0 Gy to 70.2 Gy (7020 rad) and then to 75.6 Gy (7560 rad).31 The results of that study investigating escalated doses of hyperfractionated radiotherapy demonstrated a trend toward increased overall survival and disease-free survival at 70.2 Gy. Although neurologic improvement at 70.2 Gy was similar to that at 66.0 Gy (77% [30/39]), survival times differed; the probability of survival at 2 years was only about 5% for children treated at 66.0 and 75.6 Gy and was 22% for children treated at 70.2 Gy.

Similarly, 284 children with rhabdomyosarcoma were treated with hyperfractionated EBRT to 59.4 Gy (5940 rad) at 1.1 Gy per fraction, twice daily with a 6- to 8-hour interfraction interval, to assess the toxicity of hyperfractionated radiation combined with chemotherapeutic treatment.32 This was a 10% calculated dose increase of the biologically effective dose over conventional daily fractionation. No deaths or unusual toxic effects were reported in any of the patients treated (0% [0/284]).

Thirty-nine patients with Ewing sarcoma were treated by several different regimens incorporating hyperfractionated EBRT at 1.2 Gy per fraction, twice daily with a 6-hour interfraction interval.33 Total dose delivered depended on response to chemotherapy and was 50.4 Gy(5040 rad) for complete regression, 55.2 Gy (5520 rad) for 50% resolution, and 60 Gy (6000 rad) for 50% resolution of soft tissue mass. The 5-year local control rate for the 3 different systemic regimens and the hyperfractionated radiosurgery as given in this paragraph was similar at 88% to 92%, indicating improved long-term function as compared with once-a-day standard treatment regimens.

Hyperfractionated EBRT and adjuvant chemotherapy has been used to treat 23 children with medulloblastoma and primitive neuroectodermal tumors.29 Both the primary site and neuroaxis were treated with 1.0-Gy (100-rad) fractions, twice daily with 4- to 6-hour interfraction intervals. Total dose to the primary tumor and other areas of measurable intracranial disease was 72 Gy (7200 rad). The prophylactic craniospinal dose was 36 Gy(3600 rad), with boosting to metastatic spinal deposits. After radiation treatment, all patients had multiagent chemotherapy. Of 15 patients with high T stages with large locally invasive tumor and no evidence of metastases, 14 were in continuous remission for a median of 78 months. No patient in this group died. Of 4 patients with both high T and M stages, 2 were alive in continuous remission at 69 and 35 months, and 2 died at 18 and 30 months. In 4 patients whose primary site was outside of the cerebellum, 3 of whom had M3 disease, none responded completely to therapy.

The increased efficacy and minimal toxicity demonstrated in these clinical studies and in our laboratory evaluations with the use of hyperfractionated EBRT suggest a possible application in the treatment of pediatric retinoblastoma.

The present study documents that the TCD50 for 2.0-Gy EBRT, once daily, was 45.0 Gy in this transgenic murine model of retinoblastoma. In contrast, with the use of 1.2-Gy fractions administered twice per day, a TCD50 of 33.0 Gy (3300 rad) was observed, demonstrating the increased efficacy of hyperfractionated EBRT.

Previous experiments in our laboratory have documented the TCD50s and dose-effect curves for transgenic mice treated with clinically relevant EBRT doses.42 - 43 The current study further establishes a clear dose-effect relationship of EBRT delivered in hyperfractionation. These results suggest that lowering the fraction per radiation dose from the conventional 1.8 to 2.0 Gy once per day to a fractionated dose of 1.2 Gy twice per day may provide enhanced tumor control, while reducing the overall treatment dose.

In the past 10 years, systemic chemotherapy has largely replaced EBRT in the treatment of medium to large tumors (Reese-Ellsworth stage IV and V).9 Systemic administration of chemotherapy, as a primary treatment modality, has been used in small to medium-sized tumors to decrease the tumor volume of intraocular retinoblastoma.44 - 49 Clinical trials have also demonstrated the benefits of chemoreduction combined with adjuvant therapy.46 ,50 - 52 Although effective in reducing the tumor volume in small to medium-sized tumors, chemoreduction plus local cryotherapy, laser photocoagulation, thermotherapy, or plaque radiation therapy has not proved as effective in the treatment of large tumors (Reese-Ellsworth group 5).48 ,53 Recent studies indicate that EBRT is often needed as salvage therapy after failure of systemic chemoreduction management of large retinoblastoma tumors.48 ,53 In addition, new reports of patients treated with EBRT indicate lower incidences of second tumor development among long-term survivors of heritable retinoblastoma than previously reported.5 ,54 External beam radiation therapy remains a valuable treatment option, particularly in the management of tumors with extensive vitreous seeding, for tumors located near the optic nerve, or after the failure of systemic chemotherapy.

Hyperfractionated radiotherapy may prove most useful in combination with adjuvant therapies, or as salvage therapy for patients who have previously undergone systemic chemotherapy. To decrease the risk of secondary malignancy after chemotherapy treatment, new studies have investigated the local delivery of chemotherapy via subconjunctival injection, peribulbar injection, episcleral balloon delivery, and coulomb-controlled iontophoresis.42 - 43 ,55 - 58 The use of hyperfractionated EBRT in combination with local chemotherapy may provide effective treatment, while minimizing toxicity and the increased incidence of secondary malignancy.

This study demonstrates improved efficacy of twice vs once-daily radiotherapy without increased toxicity in short-term follow-up within a transgenic murine model of heritable retinoblastoma. Limitations of this study are inherent in the application of animal modeling to human clinical disease. These data establish a framework for pilot clinical evaluation of hyperfractionation in the treatment of childhood retinoblastoma requiring EBRT. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy may offer the benefits of increased tumor control in patients with childhood retinoblastoma, while minimizing the total radiation dose and thus potentially lowering the risk of treatment-related complications.

Shields  JA, Shields  CL. Intraocular Tumors: A Text and Atlas.  Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders Co1992;377- 392
Char  D. Clinical Ocular Oncology.  New York, NY Churchill Livingstone Inc1989;207- 224
Wiggs  J, Nordenskjold  M, Yandell  D.  et al.  Prediction of the risk of hereditary retinoblastoma, using DNA polymorphisms within the retinoblastoma gene. N Engl J Med. 1988;318151- 157
Lueder  GT, Judisch  F, O'Gorman  TW. Second nonocular tumors in survivors of heritable retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104372- 373
Roarty  JD, McLean  IW, Zimmerman  LE. Incidence of second neoplasms in patients with bilateral retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 1988;951583- 1587
Tamboli  A, Podgor  MJ, Horm  JW. The incidence of retinoblastoma in the United States: 1974 through 1985. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108128- 132
Shields  CL, Shields  JA. Recent developments in the management of retinoblastoma. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1999;368- 18
Scott  IU, O'Brien  JM, Murray  TG. Retinoblastoma: a review emphasizing genetics and management strategies. Semin Ophthalmol. 1997;1259- 71
Shields  JA, Shields  CL. Current management of retinoblastoma. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994;6950- 56
Ellsworth  RM. The practical management of retinoblastoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1969;67462- 534
Amendola  BE, Lamm  FR, Markoe  AM.  et al.  Radiotherapy of retinoblastoma: a review of 63 children treated with different irradiation techniques. Cancer. 1990;6621- 26
O'Brien  JM, Smith  BJ. Chemotherapy in the treatment of retinoblastoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1996;3611- 24
Hernandez  JC, Brady  LW, Shields  JA.  et al.  External beam radiation for retinoblastoma: results, patterns of failure, and a proposal for treatment guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;35125- 132
Hungerford  JL, Toma  NM, Plowman  PN, Kingston  JE. External beam radiotherapy for retinoblastoma, I: whole eye technique. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79109- 111
Kingston  JE, Hungerford  JL, Madreperla  SA, Plowman  PN. Results of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced intraocular retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;1141339- 1343
Hawkins  MM, Draper  GJ, Kingston  JE. Incidence of second primary tumours among childhood cancer survivors. Br J Cancer. 1987;56339- 347
Hungerford  JL, Toma  NM, Plowman  PN, Doughty  D, Kingston  JE. Whole-eye versus lens-sparing megavoltage therapy for retinoblastoma. Front Radiat Ther Oncol. 1997;3081- 87
Kingston  JE, Hawkins  MM, Draper  GJ, Marsden  HB, Kinner Wilson  LM. Patterns of multiple primary tumours in patients treated for cancer during childhood. Br J Cancer. 1987;56331- 338
Eng  C, Li  FP, Abramson  DH.  et al.  Mortality from second tumors among long-term survivors of retinoblastoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;851121- 1128
Abramson  DH, Ellsworth  RM, Kitchin  FD, Tung  G. Second non-ocular tumors in retinoblastoma survivors: are they radiation induced? Ophthalmology. 1984;911351- 1355
Abramson  DH, Frank  CM. Second nonocular tumors in survivors of bilateral retinoblastoma: a possible age effect on radiation-related risk. Ophthalmology. 1998;105573- 579
Mendenhall  WM, Parsons  JT. Altered fractionation in radiation therapy for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Invest. 1998;16594- 603
Maguire  P, Clough  R, Friedman  A, Halperin  EC. Fractionated external beam radiation therapy for meningiomas of the cavernous sinus. Pediatr Radiother. 1998;4475- 79
Madreperla  SA, Hungerford  JL, Doughty  D, Plowman  PN, Kingston  JE, Singh  AD. Treatment of retinoblastoma vitreous base seeding. Ophthalmology. 1998;105120- 124
Kalapurakal  JA, Thomas  PRM. Pediatric radiotherapy. Radiol Clin North Am. 1997;351265- 1280
Baumann  M, Beck-Bornholdt  H. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy: tops or flops? Med Pediatr Oncol. 1999;33399- 402
Bernier  J, Thames  H, Smith  C, Horiot  JC. Tumor response, mucosal reactions and late effects after conventional and hyperfractionated radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 1998;47137- 143
Baumann  M, Bentzen  S, Ang  K. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: a second look at the clinical data. Radiother Oncol. 1998;46127- 130
Allen  JU, Donahue  B, DaRosso  R, Nirenberg  A. Hyperfractionated craniospinal radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for children with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma and other primitive neuroectodermal tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;361155- 1161
Freeman  CR, Krischer  JP, Sanford  RA, Burger  PC, Cohen  M, Norvis  D. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy in brain stem tumors: results of a Pediatric Oncology Group Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988;15311- 318
Freeman  CR, Krischer  JP, Sanford  RA.  et al.  Final results of a study of escalating dose of hyperfractionated radiotherapy in brain stem tumors in children: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;27197- 206
Donaldson  SS, Asmar  L, Breneman  J.  et al.  Hyperfractionated radiation in children with rhabdomyosarcoma: results of an Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Pilot Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;32903- 911
Marcus  R  Jr, Cantor  A, Heare  TU.  et al.  Local control and function after twice-a-day radiotherapy for Ewing's sarcoma of bone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;211509- 1515
Scott  IU, Murray  TG, Feuer  WJ.  et al.  External beam radiotherapy in retinoblastoma: a comparison of 2 techniques. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117766- 770
Bedford  MA, Bedotto  C, Macfaul  PA. Retinoblastoma: a study of 139 cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 1971;5519- 27
Foote  RL, Garretson  BR, Schomberg  PJ, Buskirk  SJ, Robertson  DM, Earle  JD. External beam irradiation for retinoblastoma: patterns of failure and dose-response analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;16823- 830
Ehlers  N, Kaae  S. Effects of ionizing radiation on retinoblastoma and on the normal ocular fundus in infants: a photographic and fluorescein angiographic study. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1987;1813- 84
O'Brien  JM, Marcus  DM, Niffenegger  AS.  et al.  Trilateral retinoblastoma in transgenic mice. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1989;87301- 322
Windle  JJ, Albert  DM, O'Brien  JM.  et al.  Retinoblastoma in transgenic mice. Nature. 1990;343:665-669
O'Brien  JM, Marcus  DM, Bernards  R.  et al.  A transgenic mouse model for trilateral retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:1145-1151
Mills  MD, Windle  JJ, Albert  DM. Retinoblastoma in transgenic mice: models of hereditary retinoblastoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999;43508- 518
Murray  TG, Roth  DB, O'Brien  JM.  et al.  Local carboplatin and radiation therapy in the treatment of murine transgenic retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;1141385- 1389
Murray  TG, O'Brien  JM, Steeves  RA.  et al.  Radiation therapy and ferromagnetic hyperthermia in the treatment of murine transgenic retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;1141376- 1381
Freire  J, Miyamoto  C, Brady  LW.  et al.  Retinoblastoma after chemoreduction and irradiation: preliminary results. Front Radiat Ther Oncol. 1997;3088- 92
Bechrakis  NE, Bornfeld  N, Schueler  A, Coupland  SE, Henze  G, Foerster  MH. Clinicopathologic features of retinoblastoma after primary chemoreduction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116887- 893
Shields  CL, De Potter  P, Himelstein  BP, Shields  JA, Meadows  AT, Maris  JM. Chemoreduction in the initial management of intraocular retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;1141330- 1338
Greenwald  MJ, Goldman  S, Strauss  LC. Combined chemoreduction and adjuvant treatment for intraocular retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;1051579- 1581
Friedman  DL, Himelstein  B, Shields  CL.  et al.  Chemoreduction and local ophthalmic therapy for intraocular retinoblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2000;1812- 17
Finger  PT, Czechonska  G, Demirci  H, Rausen  A. Chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: a current topic. Drugs. 1999;58983- 996
Gallie  BL, Budning  A, DeBoer  G.  et al.  Chemotherapy with focal therapy can cure intraocular retinoblastoma without radiotherapy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:1321-1328[published correction appears inArch Ophthalmol 1997;115525
Shields  CL, Shields  JA, Needle  M.  et al.  Combined chemoreduction and adjuvant treatment for intraocular retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;1042101- 2111
Murphree  AL, Villablanca  JG, Deegan  WF  III.  et al.  Chemotherapy plus local treatment in the management of intraocular retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;1141348- 1356
Gunduz  K, Shields  CL, Shields  JA.  et al.  The outcome of chemoreduction treatment in patients with Reese-Ellsworth group V retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;1161613- 1617
Mohney  BG, Robertson  DM, Schomberg  PJ, Hodge  DO. Second nonocular tumors in survivors of heritable retinoblastoma and prior radiation therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126269- 277
Murray  TG, Cicciarelli  N, O'Brien  JM.  et al.  Subconjunctival carboplatin therapy and cryotherapy in the treatment of transgenic murine retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;1151286- 1290
Harbour  JW, Murray  TG, Hamasaki  D.  et al.  Local carboplatin therapy in transgenic murine retinoblastoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;371892- 1898
Mendelsohn  ME, Abramson  DH, Madden  T, Tong  W, Tran  HT, Dunkel  IJ. Intraocular concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents after systemic or local administration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1209-1212
Abramson  DH, Frank  CM, Dunkel  IJ. A phase I/II study of subconjunctival carboplatin for intraocular retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 1999;1061947- 1950

Submitted for publication July 25, 2000; final revision received July 23, 2001; accepted August 16, 2001.

This study was supported by Fight for Sight and Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY; Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center, University of Miami; and the American Cancer Society Florida Division, Tampa.

We thank Rick Fitterer, RTT, Tony Iacavone, RTT, Gino Giordani, RTT, and Cathy Boehm, RTT, for technical assistance with EBRT.

Corresponding author and reprints: Timothy G. Murray, MD, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, PO Box 016880, Miami, FL 33101.

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 6.

External beam radiation dose-response curves using probit analysis demonstrating the proportion of tumor-containing eyes controlled by fractionated radiation treatments by total treatment dose. Increasing treatment frequency from 2.0 Gy once daily to 1.2 Gy twice daily is associated with increased tumor control with a reduction in the tumor control dose for 50% of eyes. Tumor control can be further increased with the use of 5.0-Gy fractions twice daily; however, this dose is relatively toxic and, therefore, not clinically relevant. To convert gray to rad, multiply by 100.

Grahic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 5.

Enucleated globes of transgenic mice after receiving external beam radiotherapy in 5.0-Gy (500-rad) fractions twice per day. All eyes were enucleated at 16 weeks of age. A, Eye treated with a total dose of 20.0 Gy (2000 rad). Note that trace tumor is present. B, Eye treated with a total dose of 30.0 Gy (3000 rad). Note complete absence of tumor. C, Eye treated with a total dose of 50.0 Gy (5000 rad). Note complete absence of tumor. Evidence of cataract, scleral thinning, and corneal decompensation are present (original magnification Ă—7).

Grahic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 4.

Enucleated globes of transgenic mice after receiving external beam radiotherapy in 1.2-Gy (120-rad) fractions twice per day. All eyes were enucleated at 16 weeks of age. A, Eye treated with a total dose of 24.0 Gy (2400 rad). A small tumor is present. B, Eye receiving a total radiation dose of 33.6 Gy (3360 rad). Note the presence of microscopic tumor. C, Eye treated with a total dose of 48.0 Gy (4800 rad). Complete absence of tumor is demonstrated. No evidence of cataract or other toxic effect is present (original magnification Ă—7).

Grahic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.

Enucleated globes of transgenic mice after receiving external beam radiotherapy in 2.0-Gy (200-rad) fractions once per day. All eyes were enucleated at 16 weeks of age. A, Eye treated with a total dose of 24.0 Gy (2400 rad). Note that a large tumor is present. B, Eye treated with a total dose of 36.0 Gy (3600 rad). A moderate-sized tumor is present. C, Eye treated with a total dose of 48.0 Gy (4800 rad). Microscopic tumor is present. Note that no evidence of cataract, scleral thinning, corneal decompensation, or retinal abnormality is present (original magnificationĂ—7).

Grahic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.

Enucleated globe of a 16-week-old transgenic retinoblastoma mouse that received no treatment (control). Note large retinal tumor (original magnification Ă—7).

Grahic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.

Midline shielding and immobilization apparatus for orbital external beam radiation therapy.

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

Table Grahic Jump LocationTumor Response for Each Subgroup of Conventional Single-Daily and Hyperfractionation Twice-Daily Therapy at Each Dose Fraction*

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Shields  JA, Shields  CL. Intraocular Tumors: A Text and Atlas.  Philadelphia, Pa WB Saunders Co1992;377- 392
Char  D. Clinical Ocular Oncology.  New York, NY Churchill Livingstone Inc1989;207- 224
Wiggs  J, Nordenskjold  M, Yandell  D.  et al.  Prediction of the risk of hereditary retinoblastoma, using DNA polymorphisms within the retinoblastoma gene. N Engl J Med. 1988;318151- 157
Lueder  GT, Judisch  F, O'Gorman  TW. Second nonocular tumors in survivors of heritable retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1986;104372- 373
Roarty  JD, McLean  IW, Zimmerman  LE. Incidence of second neoplasms in patients with bilateral retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 1988;951583- 1587
Tamboli  A, Podgor  MJ, Horm  JW. The incidence of retinoblastoma in the United States: 1974 through 1985. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108128- 132
Shields  CL, Shields  JA. Recent developments in the management of retinoblastoma. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1999;368- 18
Scott  IU, O'Brien  JM, Murray  TG. Retinoblastoma: a review emphasizing genetics and management strategies. Semin Ophthalmol. 1997;1259- 71
Shields  JA, Shields  CL. Current management of retinoblastoma. Mayo Clin Proc. 1994;6950- 56
Ellsworth  RM. The practical management of retinoblastoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1969;67462- 534
Amendola  BE, Lamm  FR, Markoe  AM.  et al.  Radiotherapy of retinoblastoma: a review of 63 children treated with different irradiation techniques. Cancer. 1990;6621- 26
O'Brien  JM, Smith  BJ. Chemotherapy in the treatment of retinoblastoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1996;3611- 24
Hernandez  JC, Brady  LW, Shields  JA.  et al.  External beam radiation for retinoblastoma: results, patterns of failure, and a proposal for treatment guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;35125- 132
Hungerford  JL, Toma  NM, Plowman  PN, Kingston  JE. External beam radiotherapy for retinoblastoma, I: whole eye technique. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995;79109- 111
Kingston  JE, Hungerford  JL, Madreperla  SA, Plowman  PN. Results of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for advanced intraocular retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;1141339- 1343
Hawkins  MM, Draper  GJ, Kingston  JE. Incidence of second primary tumours among childhood cancer survivors. Br J Cancer. 1987;56339- 347
Hungerford  JL, Toma  NM, Plowman  PN, Doughty  D, Kingston  JE. Whole-eye versus lens-sparing megavoltage therapy for retinoblastoma. Front Radiat Ther Oncol. 1997;3081- 87
Kingston  JE, Hawkins  MM, Draper  GJ, Marsden  HB, Kinner Wilson  LM. Patterns of multiple primary tumours in patients treated for cancer during childhood. Br J Cancer. 1987;56331- 338
Eng  C, Li  FP, Abramson  DH.  et al.  Mortality from second tumors among long-term survivors of retinoblastoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;851121- 1128
Abramson  DH, Ellsworth  RM, Kitchin  FD, Tung  G. Second non-ocular tumors in retinoblastoma survivors: are they radiation induced? Ophthalmology. 1984;911351- 1355
Abramson  DH, Frank  CM. Second nonocular tumors in survivors of bilateral retinoblastoma: a possible age effect on radiation-related risk. Ophthalmology. 1998;105573- 579
Mendenhall  WM, Parsons  JT. Altered fractionation in radiation therapy for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Invest. 1998;16594- 603
Maguire  P, Clough  R, Friedman  A, Halperin  EC. Fractionated external beam radiation therapy for meningiomas of the cavernous sinus. Pediatr Radiother. 1998;4475- 79
Madreperla  SA, Hungerford  JL, Doughty  D, Plowman  PN, Kingston  JE, Singh  AD. Treatment of retinoblastoma vitreous base seeding. Ophthalmology. 1998;105120- 124
Kalapurakal  JA, Thomas  PRM. Pediatric radiotherapy. Radiol Clin North Am. 1997;351265- 1280
Baumann  M, Beck-Bornholdt  H. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy: tops or flops? Med Pediatr Oncol. 1999;33399- 402
Bernier  J, Thames  H, Smith  C, Horiot  JC. Tumor response, mucosal reactions and late effects after conventional and hyperfractionated radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 1998;47137- 143
Baumann  M, Bentzen  S, Ang  K. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: a second look at the clinical data. Radiother Oncol. 1998;46127- 130
Allen  JU, Donahue  B, DaRosso  R, Nirenberg  A. Hyperfractionated craniospinal radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for children with newly diagnosed medulloblastoma and other primitive neuroectodermal tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;361155- 1161
Freeman  CR, Krischer  JP, Sanford  RA, Burger  PC, Cohen  M, Norvis  D. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy in brain stem tumors: results of a Pediatric Oncology Group Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988;15311- 318
Freeman  CR, Krischer  JP, Sanford  RA.  et al.  Final results of a study of escalating dose of hyperfractionated radiotherapy in brain stem tumors in children: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;27197- 206
Donaldson  SS, Asmar  L, Breneman  J.  et al.  Hyperfractionated radiation in children with rhabdomyosarcoma: results of an Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Pilot Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;32903- 911
Marcus  R  Jr, Cantor  A, Heare  TU.  et al.  Local control and function after twice-a-day radiotherapy for Ewing's sarcoma of bone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;211509- 1515
Scott  IU, Murray  TG, Feuer  WJ.  et al.  External beam radiotherapy in retinoblastoma: a comparison of 2 techniques. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117766- 770
Bedford  MA, Bedotto  C, Macfaul  PA. Retinoblastoma: a study of 139 cases. Br J Ophthalmol. 1971;5519- 27
Foote  RL, Garretson  BR, Schomberg  PJ, Buskirk  SJ, Robertson  DM, Earle  JD. External beam irradiation for retinoblastoma: patterns of failure and dose-response analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989;16823- 830
Ehlers  N, Kaae  S. Effects of ionizing radiation on retinoblastoma and on the normal ocular fundus in infants: a photographic and fluorescein angiographic study. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl. 1987;1813- 84
O'Brien  JM, Marcus  DM, Niffenegger  AS.  et al.  Trilateral retinoblastoma in transgenic mice. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1989;87301- 322
Windle  JJ, Albert  DM, O'Brien  JM.  et al.  Retinoblastoma in transgenic mice. Nature. 1990;343:665-669
O'Brien  JM, Marcus  DM, Bernards  R.  et al.  A transgenic mouse model for trilateral retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990;108:1145-1151
Mills  MD, Windle  JJ, Albert  DM. Retinoblastoma in transgenic mice: models of hereditary retinoblastoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999;43508- 518
Murray  TG, Roth  DB, O'Brien  JM.  et al.  Local carboplatin and radiation therapy in the treatment of murine transgenic retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;1141385- 1389
Murray  TG, O'Brien  JM, Steeves  RA.  et al.  Radiation therapy and ferromagnetic hyperthermia in the treatment of murine transgenic retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;1141376- 1381
Freire  J, Miyamoto  C, Brady  LW.  et al.  Retinoblastoma after chemoreduction and irradiation: preliminary results. Front Radiat Ther Oncol. 1997;3088- 92
Bechrakis  NE, Bornfeld  N, Schueler  A, Coupland  SE, Henze  G, Foerster  MH. Clinicopathologic features of retinoblastoma after primary chemoreduction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116887- 893
Shields  CL, De Potter  P, Himelstein  BP, Shields  JA, Meadows  AT, Maris  JM. Chemoreduction in the initial management of intraocular retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;1141330- 1338
Greenwald  MJ, Goldman  S, Strauss  LC. Combined chemoreduction and adjuvant treatment for intraocular retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 1998;1051579- 1581
Friedman  DL, Himelstein  B, Shields  CL.  et al.  Chemoreduction and local ophthalmic therapy for intraocular retinoblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2000;1812- 17
Finger  PT, Czechonska  G, Demirci  H, Rausen  A. Chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: a current topic. Drugs. 1999;58983- 996
Gallie  BL, Budning  A, DeBoer  G.  et al.  Chemotherapy with focal therapy can cure intraocular retinoblastoma without radiotherapy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114:1321-1328[published correction appears inArch Ophthalmol 1997;115525
Shields  CL, Shields  JA, Needle  M.  et al.  Combined chemoreduction and adjuvant treatment for intraocular retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 1997;1042101- 2111
Murphree  AL, Villablanca  JG, Deegan  WF  III.  et al.  Chemotherapy plus local treatment in the management of intraocular retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;1141348- 1356
Gunduz  K, Shields  CL, Shields  JA.  et al.  The outcome of chemoreduction treatment in patients with Reese-Ellsworth group V retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;1161613- 1617
Mohney  BG, Robertson  DM, Schomberg  PJ, Hodge  DO. Second nonocular tumors in survivors of heritable retinoblastoma and prior radiation therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126269- 277
Murray  TG, Cicciarelli  N, O'Brien  JM.  et al.  Subconjunctival carboplatin therapy and cryotherapy in the treatment of transgenic murine retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;1151286- 1290
Harbour  JW, Murray  TG, Hamasaki  D.  et al.  Local carboplatin therapy in transgenic murine retinoblastoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;371892- 1898
Mendelsohn  ME, Abramson  DH, Madden  T, Tong  W, Tran  HT, Dunkel  IJ. Intraocular concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents after systemic or local administration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1209-1212
Abramson  DH, Frank  CM, Dunkel  IJ. A phase I/II study of subconjunctival carboplatin for intraocular retinoblastoma. Ophthalmology. 1999;1061947- 1950

Correspondence

CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles