0
Correspondence |

Rinsing of the Cannula Prior to IntravitrealInjection—Reply

Mark C. Gillies, FRANZCO, PhD
[+] Author Affiliations

Copyright 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

More Author Information
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(10):1572-1572. doi:10.1001/archopht.122.10.1572-a
Text Size: A A A
Published online

In reply

I thank Drs Degenring and Jonas for their thoughtful comments on ourstudy of a single injection of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide for exudativeage-related macular degeneration, any part of which was classic. Althoughit is true that we might have found an effect of the drug on the primary outcome(loss of 30 logMAR letters) if we had treated the patients every 4 to 6 months,we were as surprised as everyone else when we did not find a beneficial effecton severe or moderate (15 letters) vision loss even at the 3- or 6-month timepoints. Whatever the reason for this might be (apart from the possibilitythat it is simply not particularly efficacious for classic subretinal neovascularization),incorrect preparation of the injection is not it. We can confirm that theinjections were performed using a standardized technique by an experiencedretinal fellow. This entailed drawing up at least 0.2 mL of the drug aftershaking the ampoule, then expressing air and the drug to leave 0.15 mL ofthe drug in the syringe before attaching a 27-gauge needle. The plunger wasadvanced until the 0.05-mL dead space was eliminated, after which a full 0.1mL was injected into the vitreous. In our article, we compared the outcomesof treated eyes that exhibited an intraocular pressure response, which werethus marked as having received a significant dose of steroid, with those thatdid not, and we found no difference.

I am aware that our results directly contradict a number of other reports.Painful experience during the last 5 years that is so widely recognized itneed not be mentioned here has shown that only a limited amount can be inferredfrom clinical trials of treatments for neovascular macular degeneration, unlessthey include masked randomization to treatment and control groups with measurementof best-corrected logMAR visual acuity. I believe that an effect of intravitrealsteroids on macular edema, in which Jonas' group has played a prominent role,may have contributed to the impression that the treatment was working forsubretinal neovascularization in the short term. We have confirmed in a randomizedclinical trial of 65 eyes with diabetic foveal edema that intravitreal triamcinoloneacetonide results in a significant reduction in edema with an improvementof visual acuity 3 months after the injection.1 Iam confident that further careful basic and clinical research will identifythe clinical situations in which intravitreal steroids will benefit our patients.

Correspondence: Dr Gillies, Save Sight and Eye Health Institute,University of Sydney, GPO Box 4337, Sydney NSW 2001, Australia (mark@eye.usyd.edu.au).

REFERENCES

Sutter  FKP, Simpson  JM, Gillies  MC. Intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema that persistsafter laser treatment: 3 months efficacy and safety results of a prospective,randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Ophthalmology. In press.

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Sutter  FKP, Simpson  JM, Gillies  MC. Intravitreal triamcinolone for diabetic macular edema that persistsafter laser treatment: 3 months efficacy and safety results of a prospective,randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Ophthalmology. In press.

Correspondence

CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles
JAMAevidence.com

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Example 1: Diabetes and Target Blood Pressure

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Table 9.2-3 Refuted Evidence From Observational Studiesa