0
Surgical Technique | Surgeon's Corner

Standardized “No-Touch” Technique for Descemet Membrane Endothelial KeratoplastyStandardized “No Touch” Technique for DMEK FREE

Isabel Dapena, MD; Kyros Moutsouris, MD; Konstantinos Droutsas, MD, PhD; Lisanne Ham, MSc; Korine van Dijk, MSc; Gerrit R. J. Melles, MD, PhD
Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(1):88-94. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.334
Text Size: A A A
Published online

We describe a standardized technique for “no-touch” isolated Descemet membrane transplant, ie, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). All essential steps, including patient preparation and descemetorhexis as well as DMEK graft implantation, orientation, unrolling, centering, appositioning, and fixation, are described in detail. In the management of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy, the technique may provide a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better (≥0.8) in three-quarters of cases and an endothelial cell density of about 1800 to 2000 cells/mm2 at 6 months after surgery. No-touch DMEK may therefore be a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of corneal endothelial disorders, making endothelial keratoplasty accessible to most corneal surgeons without requiring major investments while providing an unprecedented visual rehabilitation rate and outcome.

Figures in this Article

Recently, we described the transplant of an isolated donor Descemet membrane and its endothelium, Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), in the management of corneal endothelial disorders.1 4 Although the feasibility of DMEK was reported in 19985 and 2002,6 the early endothelial keratoplasty techniques deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane (automated) endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK/DSAEK) were adopted quicker,7 9 probably because at that time the latter procedures were technically easier for both corneal surgeons and eye banks. In contrast to deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty and DSEK/DSAEK, however, DMEK may provide near instantaneous as well as complete visual rehabilitation in a majority of cases, potentially higher graft survival with larger-diameter transplants, and a more efficient use of donor corneal tissue, while requiring minimal investments.3 ,10 Hence, DMEK merited further refinement to modify the procedure into a simplified and standardized technique, feasible for all corneal surgeons after proper training.

In the current article, we describe step by step a standardized “no-touch” technique for DMEK, allowing facilitated implantation, orientation, unrolling, centering, and appositioning of a DMEK graft. The procedure was designed to enable corneal surgeons to perform DMEK in a controlled fashion while optimizing the visual outcome and minimizing the risk of graft detachment and endothelial cell damage.

OBTAINING A SOFT EYE

In the analysis of the first series of 150 DMEK surgeries, the presence of intraoperative posterior (vitreous) pressure was found to be the main cause of complicated tissue handling during surgery. In DMEK, maintaining the anterior chamber pressure by infusion of balanced salt solution (BSS) may be avoided because an overpressure in the anterior chamber bears the risk of flushing the graft out, even through a side port. In the presence of posterior (vitreous) pressure, a shallow anterior chamber may therefore hinder virtually all manipulation of the DMEK graft within the eye, in particular, orientation and unfolding of the relatively thin transplant. Hence, obtaining a soft eye to avoid posterior (vitreous) pressure is a critical step in the procedure.

To achieve a soft eye, 4 precautions or actions should be considered: the surgical bed should be positioned in an anti-Trendelenburg position; after retrobulbar injection (4-5 mL of 10-mg/mL ropivacaine hydrochloride mixed with 150-IE hyaluronidase), a manual ocular massage should be performed for 2 to 3 minutes, followed by oculopressure with a Honan balloon for another 10 to 15 minutes; and during surgery, the tightness of the eyelid speculum should be carefully monitored, and it should be released if the anterior chamber is shallow or if any signs of vitreous pressure are observed.

INCISIONS AND DESCEMETORHEXIS

At the 12-o’clock surgical position, a 50% scleral-depth limbal incision, 3.0 mm wide, should be made and extended by lamellar dissection into the clear cornea with a slit knife to create a self-sealing 3.0-mm clear cornea tunnel incision. Three side ports can be created at the 10:30, 1:30, and 7:30 (right eye) or 4:30 (left eye) clock positions with a surgical knife (Figure 1). With a 30-gauge cannula through a side port, the anterior chamber is completely filled with air. Under air, the recipient Descemet membrane is scored over 360° using a reversed Sinskey hook (catalog No. 50.1971B; DORC International, Zuidland, the Netherlands) prior to stripping off the membrane (descemetorhexis) with the reversed Sinskey hook or a Descemet scraper (catalog No. 50.2118; DORC International). During descemetorhexis, the tissue removal should be carefully monitored under air to avoid remnant Descemet membrane “islands,” which may occur in 50% of cases, since these remnants may affect the final visual acuity achieved and/or graft adherence to the posterior stroma.11 12 The main incision may be completed after descemetorhexis to better maintain a complete air fill of the anterior chamber during the descemetorhexis.

Figure 1.

Artist impression of the incisions used in no-touch Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. The main incision is at 12 o’clock (orange arrow) and the side ports are at the 10:30, 1:30, and 7:30 (right eye) or 4:30 (left eye) clock positions (green arrows).

Grahic Jump Location
PREPARATION OF THE DMEK GRAFT

The donor DMEK graft should be predissected in an eye bank to enable endothelial cell density measurements and sterility testing before releasing the tissue for surgery. At Amnitrans Eyebank Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, a DMEK roll is routinely stripped off from a donor sclerocorneal rim (with a minimal cell count of 2300 cells/mm2 and no age restrictions) and stored for 1 or 2 weeks in a glass vial with modified minimum essential medium at 31°C, until the date of transplant (Figure 2).13 At surgery, the content of the glass vial is poured into a glass bowl, and with a glass pipette (catalog No. 612-2297; Omnilabo, Breda, the Netherlands), the culture medium is carefully drained from the bowl, avoiding any contact and/or damage of the membrane (Figure 3). In the bowl, the DMEK roll is thoroughly rinsed (2-3 times) with BSS (Alcon Nederland BV, Gorinchem, the Netherlands) until all macroscopically visible preservation medium residues attached to the tissue are removed. The DMEK roll is then stained with trypan blue, 0.06% (catalog No. VBL.10S.USA, VisionBlue; DORC International), for about 30 seconds, rinsed with BSS, and again stained with trypan blue to obtain an intense blue tissue to ensure visibility of the graft in the recipient anterior chamber throughout the surgery. The DMEK roll can be rinsed again with BSS to remove all excess dye. New surgeons starting out with DMEK may want to apply a direct flow on top of the tissue with BSS to open up the roll and to create a double roll, like the plastic tubes of an electrical cord, to further facilitate unfolding of the tissue after implantation in the recipient anterior chamber (Figure 3). If the blue staining of the membrane fades away during the surgery, the graft can be restained by a few drops of trypan blue, 0.06%, injected in the anterior chamber, followed by rinsing out the excess dye.

Figure 2.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft in a vial with organ culture medium. After stripping off the Descemet membrane from a donor corneoscleral rim at the eye bank, the tissue spontaneously forms a DMEK roll. After 1 to 2 weeks of organ culture, during which the endothelial cell density and sterility are checked, the graft is sent off for transplant in a DMEK procedure.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3.

Artist impression of the final preparation of the donor graft on the surgical table. A and B, The Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty roll is transferred into a glass bowl and thoroughly rinsed with balanced salt solution until all macroscopically visible organ culture medium is removed. C-F, After staining with trypan blue, 0.06%, for 30 seconds (C and D), the Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty roll is rinsed with balanced salt solution to remove all excess dye and form a double roll (E and F).

Grahic Jump Location
IMPLANTATION OF THE DMEK GRAFT

After staining, the DMEK roll is sucked into a custom-made glass injector or a conventional Pasteur glass pipette, and under the surgical microscope, the injector is turned so that the double roll is facing upward, ie, with the hinge down (Figure 4). On the DMEK roll, unlike a taco-shaped graft in DSEK/DSAEK, the endothelial cells are located on the outer surface. Because of this, it is best to use validated glass injectors instead of plastic intraocular lens–inserting devices, since glass surfaces are much smoother than those of plastic and glass injectors can be manufactured without sharp molding edges.

Figure 4.

Clinical images and artist impressions of the insertion of the Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft. A and B, After loading the graft, the glass injector is attached to a 5-mL syringe. C and D, The position of the double roll, which should be facing up inside the injector, is checked under the surgical microscope, and the injector is positioned into the main incision to insert the DMEK roll into the recipient anterior chamber. E and F, After insertion, the double roll should still be facing up. The endothelium is located at the outer surface of the DMEK graft.

Grahic Jump Location

Using the glass injector, the DMEK roll is then inserted into the anterior chamber through the main incision at 12 o’clock (Figure 4). During insertion, the incision size should allow a sufficient leak of BSS so that the recipient anterior chamber is not overpressurized.

ORIENTING THE DMEK GRAFT

Once implanted, the DMEK roll should be rotated toward the horizontal meridian to better fit inside the anterior chamber. The graft can be easily manipulated by gentle strokes of a cannula over the outer corneal surface or the sclera overlying the iris root. This maneuver can be facilitated by injecting a small air bubble in the anterior chamber and using the bubble to indirectly rotate or move the graft (Ham maneuver) (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Clinical images displaying the centering and unfolding of a Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft within the anterior chamber. A, A small air bubble is positioned between the double rolls of the DMEK graft. Note the blue halfway up the cannula, indicating that the cannula is in part positioned inside one of the rolls (Moutsouris sign , arrow). B and C, By gently stroking the cannula over the outer corneal surface, the DMEK graft is rotated. To unroll the DMEK roll, light taps on the corneal surface (van Dijk taps) as well as manipulations of the small air bubble are used (Dapena maneuver). D and E, The air bubble is enlarged to further unroll the DMEK graft, and using the cannula at the outer corneal surface, the graft is centered. F and G, The air bubble is enlarged to completely unfold the DMEK graft and to position it onto the iris (air bubble between the graft and cornea). H and I, After approximately 10 seconds, the air bubble is aspirated and the cannula is positioned underneath the graft to inject air at the pupillary margin (air between the iris and graft). I-K, An inward fold of the DMEK graft is visible at the 4-o’clock surgical position and is repositioned, ie, unfolded, using a “bubble-bumping maneuver”; pushing the air bubble away from the fold induces an aqueous flow that unfolds the graft's peripheral edge. L, Once completely unfolded, the anterior chamber is filled with air for approximately 45 to 60 minutes. All rotating, centering, unfolding, appositioning, and fixating maneuvers should be performed with a standard 30-gauge cannula that is bent in such a way that the distal end of the cannula measures approximately 8 mm.

Grahic Jump Location

The DMEK roll may then be opened up, ie, slightly unrolled by tapping the outer corneal surface directly overlying the graft (van Dijk taps). Thereafter, the orientation of the graft in the anterior chamber may be checked by positioning the tip of a 30-gauge cannula on top of the membrane and underneath one of the peripheral curls: if the graft is correctly oriented (endothelium facing toward the iris), the tip of the cannula should be embraced by one of the rolls, becoming slightly blue as the curl overlays the cannula (Moutsouris sign) (Figure 6). If the graft is oriented upside down (endothelium facing the cornea), the tip of the cannula will not turn blue, since it cannot find an upward curl because the graft will be curling toward the iris, ie, away from the cannula. If oriented upside down, the graft may be rolled over by gently irrigating it within the anterior chamber. If the graft is turned over, its orientation may be confirmed using the Moutsouris sign. Obtaining a correct orientation of the graft is an essential step in the procedure: if the endothelium is positioned upward (facing the stroma) instead of downward (facing the iris), the DMEK graft may be prone to detachment in the early postoperative phase.

Figure 6.

Artist impression of the Moutsouris sign. A and B, When the Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft is oriented correctly within the anterior chamber (edges facing upward), the tip of the cannula can be positioned inside a peripheral curl so that the tip appears blue (arrows) because of the overlying blue donor tissue (Moutsouris sign positive). C and D, When the graft is positioned upside down (edges facing downward), the tip of the cannula cannot find the curls, so the tip will not change color (Moutsouris sign negative).

Grahic Jump Location

Special care should be taken while manipulating the DMEK graft using irrigation because the thin graft is easily flushed out of the eye when the anterior chamber is overpressurized. All manipulation should preferably be performed through one of the side ports, and if the main incision is to be used, the eye should first be softened by draining the anterior chamber through one of the side ports. Alternatively, the main incision may be partially closed with a suture.

UNFOLDING THE DMEK GRAFT

Once the DMEK graft is correctly oriented with the edges facing upward, a small air bubble may be injected in between the double roll(s) or on top of the membrane inside a curl (Figure 5). If the graft is oriented upward, the air bubble will be caught in between the rolls, and it may be manipulated to further unfold the graft by rolling the air on top of the membrane, using a cannula on the outer corneal surface (Dapena maneuver). When further unfolded, the air bubble may be enlarged until the central part of the DMEK graft is flattened over the iris. Throughout the unfolding process, direct contact between the graft and the cannula should be carefully avoided.

CENTERING THE DMEK GRAFT

Once unfolded, additional BSS should be injected into the anterior chamber to make the air bubble and the underlying DMEK graft float, ie, avoid a downward force by the air bubble that pushes the graft against the iris; alternatively, the air bubble may be reduced. The mobile graft should then be centered inside the anterior chamber by gentle strokes with the cannula over the outer corneal surface (Figure 5). Slightly decentered grafts that cover the central cornea are acceptable, because clinical observation shows that a gap between the recipient Descemet membrane peripheral rim and the decentered DMEK graft is commonly repopulated by migrating donor and/or recipient endothelial cells14 and decentering does not seem to relate to the final visual outcome. Excessive manipulation to center the graft may be avoided to minimize donor endothelial cell damage.

APPOSITIONING THE DMEK GRAFT

After centering, the air bubble on top of the DMEK graft should be enlarged to fully flatten the transplant over the iris. After approximately 10 seconds, the air should be aspirated from the anterior chamber, while holding the tip of the cannula at the center of the air bubble. Without exiting the anterior chamber, the cannula should then be slowly moved toward the edge of the transplant, positioned underneath the transplant, and again carefully moved toward the pupillary area, while slightly digging onto the iris tissue to minimize donor endothelial cell damage. At the pupillary border, a small air bubble should be injected underneath the DMEK graft to lift the transplant upward toward the recipient cornea. Then the air bubble should be slowly enlarged, while carefully observing the edges of the transplant. Not infrequently, peripheral inward folds may be present, ie, an inward curl with the endothelium facing the recipient stroma. These folds may be flattened out with a “bubble-bumping maneuver,” ie, gentle taps of the cannula on the outer corneal surface overlying the fold, to create a flow of aqueous solution by which the remnant folds disappear (Figure 5 and Figure 7). Once the DMEK graft is completely unfolded, the anterior chamber should be completely filled with air to position the transplant onto the recipient posterior stroma.

Figure 7.

Artist impression of the “bubble-bumping maneuver.” A, The Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft shows a peripheral inward fold (endothelium facing the recipient stroma). B, By indenting the outer corneal surface with a cannula, the air bubble is pushed away from the fold, and an aqueous flow is generated to unfold the edge of the graft. C, Once completely unfolded, the air bubble takes its original position to secure the now completely unfolded tissue edge against the recipient posterior stroma.

Grahic Jump Location
FIXATING THE DMEK GRAFT

To avoid postoperative graft detachment, fill the anterior chamber completely with air for at least 45 to 60 minutes, at approximately 20 mm Hg. Thereafter, a partial air-BSS exchange should be performed to leave the eye pressurized with a 30% to 50% air fill in the anterior chamber. After surgery, the patient should remain in a supine position for 24 hours to further secure the position of the DMEK graft against the recipient posterior stroma.

In phakic eyes, the air bubble should be reduced to 20% to 30% at the end of the surgery to avoid air-induced displacement of the iris diaphragm after surgery. If during surgery the air tends to move behind the iris, remove all air from the anterior chamber at the end of the procedure, since these eyes may be prone to capture the air bubble behind the iris following surgery.

To the best of our knowledge, our report is the first to describe a standardized no-touch technique for DMEK that may enable corneal surgeons to achieve the 2 most important goals in corneal transplant: a near complete visual recovery while minimizing donor endothelial cell damage. With the technique described, 95% of cases may currently reach a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better (≥0.5), and 75% may reach 20/25 or better (≥0.8) within 6 months after surgery.1 ,3 ,10 ,15 Since a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 (1.0) at 1 week after DMEK is not uncommon, the procedure may have the potential to provide instant visual recovery, as is routinely observed after phacoemulsification surgery.3 As with other endothelial keratoplasty techniques, DMEK may be associated with a drop in donor endothelial cell density in the early postoperative phase. If performed as a no-touch technique as described herein, endothelial cell damage to the isolated DMEK graft may be minimized so that an endothelial cell density of about 1800 to 2000 cells/mm2 at 6 months after DMEK may be obtained, ie, a 20% to 25% decrease relative to the preoperative endothelial cell density.16

These outcomes after DMEK may compare favorably with those after DSEK/DSAEK, which may be the most widely performed endothelial keratoplasty technique today. After DSEK/DSAEK, the best-corrected visual acuity may be on average 20/40 (0.5) at 6 months, with only a few cases reaching 20/25 or better (≥0.8).17 21 A major concern in DSEK/DSAEK is donor endothelial cell damage, up to 30% to 50% at 6 months,22 24 although the endothelial cell density may be better preserved with various injectors that are currently being developed.17 ,23 ,25

Apart from faster visual rehabilitation and near-normal visual recovery, DMEK may have several other advantages. Because the DMEK graft can be stripped off a corneoscleral rim, DMEK does not require a microkeratome or femtosecond laser to prepare the donor tissue so the procedure may be accessible to most corneal surgeons in any clinical setting. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty may also increase overall donor tissue availability, because a single donor cornea can potentially be used for 2 lamellar keratoplasty procedures, and DMEK grafts may be harvested from corneas not eligible for penetrating keratoplasty or DSEK/DSAEK.26 27

Like DSEK/DSAEK, DMEK is also a relatively safe procedure, since it is performed using a closed system during surgery, and most of the long-term complications that characterize penetrating keratoplasty (high astigmatism, suture-related complications, wound dehiscence) are rare after endothelial keratoplasty. As in DSEK/DSAEK, however, the main complication after DMEK is early graft detachment. Using the technique currently described, graft detachments may occur in 2% to 5% of cases and may be managed with a rebubbling procedure or a secondary DSEK/DSAEK.28 29 To lower the risk of (partial) graft detachments, we observed that recipient Descemet membrane remnants and/or peripheral inward folds of the DMEK graft should be avoided as well as the use of plastic vials and viscoelastic materials and that it may be critical to keep the anterior chamber completely filled with air for at least 45 to 60 minutes at the end of the procedure.3 ,10 12 ,30 The risk of graft detachment may be further reduced by careful patient selection: DMEK may be relatively contraindicated in all eyes in which the anterior chamber cannot be pressurized with an air fill at termination of the surgery, for example, in aphakic or vitrectomized eyes and in eyes with large iridectomies, a glaucoma tube, and/or a relatively shallow anterior chamber.

If both cataract extraction and DMEK surgery are required, it may be best to first perform phacoemulsification and then DMEK as a secondary operation for 2 reasons. First, the use of a viscoelastic should be avoided in any endothelial keratoplasty procedure, since it may relate to a higher risk of postoperative graft detachment.30 Second, after cataract extraction, 10% to 30% of patients were satisfied with the visual improvement achieved so DMEK could be postponed. If the crystalline lens is clear, the pupil may be constricted with pilocarpine, 2%, prior to commencing DMEK to avoid iatrogenic cataract formation due to air or surgical trauma.31

In summary, no-touch DMEK is a feasible surgical technique with the potential to give the fastest and most complete visual recovery in the management of corneal endothelial disorders today. In past years, improvements in surgical technique and tissue handling enabled our institute to develop a standardized technique that is, after proper training, accessible to most corneal surgeons at minimal costs. The procedure described was designed in such a way that each step is defined and reproducible, in particular the air-bubble manipulations, so that it can easily be taught to novice surgeons. With DSEK/DSAEK and penetrating keratoplasty still available as valuable back-up procedures,29 we anticipate that DMEK will become a preferred treatment method for corneal endothelial disorders.

Correspondence: Gerrit R. J. Melles, MD, PhD, Netherlands Institute for Innovative Ocular Surgery, Lann op Zuid 88, 3071 AA Rotterdam, the Netherlands (melles@niioc.nl).

Submitted for Publication: February 23, 2010; final revision received April 20, 2010; accepted April 25, 2010.

Financial Disclosure: Dr Melles is a consultant for DORC International/Dutch Ophthalmic USA.

Melles  GRJ, Ong  TS, Ververs  B, van der Wees  J. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 2006;25 (8) 987- 990
PubMed
Melles  GRJ, Ong  TS, Ververs  B, van der Wees  J. Preliminary clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145 (2) 222- 227
PubMed
Dapena  I, Ham  L, Melles  GRJ. Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK—the thinner the better? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2009;20 (4) 299- 307
PubMed
Melles  GRJ. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. Cornea 2006;25 (8) 879- 881
PubMed
Melles  GRJ, Rietveld  FJR, Pels  E, Beekhuis  WH, Binder  PS. Transplantation of Descemet's membrane carrying viable endothelium through a small scleral incision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39 ((suppl)) 343
Melles  GR, Lander  F, Rietveld  FJ. Transplantation of Descemet's membrane carrying viable endothelium through a small scleral incision. Cornea 2002;21 (4) 415- 418
PubMed
Terry  MA, Ousley  PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty in the first United States patients: early clinical results. Cornea 2001;20 (3) 239- 243
PubMed
Melles  GR, Wijdh  RH, Nieuwendaal  CP. A technique to excise the Descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis). Cornea 2004;23 (3) 286- 288
PubMed
Gorovoy  MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006;25 (8) 886- 889
PubMed
Ham  L, Dapena  I, van Luijk  C, van der Wees  J, Melles  GR. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: review of the first 50 consecutive cases. Eye (Lond) 2009;23 (10) 1990- 1998
PubMed
Kymionis  GD, Suh  LH, Dubovy  SR, Yoo  SH. Diagnosis of residual Descemet's membrane after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33 (7) 1322- 1324
PubMed
Dapena  I, Ham  L, Moutsouris  K, Melles  GRJ. Incidence of recipient Descemet membrane remnants at the donor-to-stromal interface after descemetorhexis in endothelial keratoplasty [published online August 1, 2010]. Br J Ophthalmol
PubMed
PubMed
Lie  JT, Birbal  R, Ham  L, van der Wees  J, Melles  GRJ. Donor tissue preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34 (9) 1578- 1583
PubMed
Price  MO, Baig  KM, Brubaker  JW, Price  FW  Jr. Randomized, prospective comparison of precut vs surgeon-dissected grafts for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146 (1) 36- 41
PubMed
Ham  L, Balachandran  C, Verschoor  CA, van der Wees  J, Melles  GR. Visual rehabilitation rate after isolated Descemet membrane transplantation: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127 (3) 252- 255
PubMed
Ham  L, van Luijk  C, Dapena  I.  et al.  Endothelial cell density after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 1- to 2-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148 (4) 521- 527
PubMed
Bahar  I, Kaiserman  I, McAllum  P, Slomovic  A, Rootman  D. Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2008;115 (9) 1525- 1533
PubMed
Chen  ES, Terry  MA, Shamie  N, Hoar  KL, Friend  DJ. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: six-month results in a prospective study of 100 eyes. Cornea 2008;27 (5) 514- 520
PubMed
Mearza  AA, Qureshi  MA, Rostron  CK. Experience and 12-month results of descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) with a small-incision technique. Cornea 2007;26 (3) 279- 283
PubMed
Terry  MA, Shamie  N, Chen  ES, Phillips  PM, Hoar  KL, Friend  DJ. Precut tissue for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: vision, astigmatism, and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology 2009;116 (2) 248- 256
PubMed
Wylegała  E, Tarnawska  D. Management of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy by combined Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty and intraocular lens exchange. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34 (10) 1708- 1714
PubMed
Koenig  SB, Covert  DJ, Dupps  WJ  Jr, Meisler  DM. Visual acuity, refractive error, and endothelial cell density six months after Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Cornea 2007;26 (6) 670- 674
PubMed
Kobayashi  A, Yokogawa  H, Sugiyama  K. Descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty for bullous keratopathies secondary to argon laser iridotomy: preliminary results and usefulness of double-glide donor insertion technique. Cornea 2008;27 ((suppl 1)) S62- S69
PubMed
Kaiserman  I, Bahar  I, McAllum  P, Slomovic  AR, Rootman  DS. Suture-assisted vs forceps-assisted insertion of the donor lenticula during Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145 (6) 986- 990
PubMed
Busin  M, Bhatt  PR, Scorcia  V. A modified technique for Descemet membrane stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty to minimize endothelial cell loss. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126 (8) 1133- 1137
PubMed
Vajpayee  RB, Sharma  N, Jhanji  V, Titiyal  JS, Tandon  R. One donor cornea for 3 recipients: a new concept for corneal transplantation surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125 (4) 552- 554
PubMed
Lie  JT, Groeneveld-van Beek  EA, Ham  L, van der Wees  J, Melles  GRJ. More efficient use of donor corneal tissue with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): two lamellar keratoplasty procedures with one donor cornea. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94 (9) 1265- 1266
PubMed
Dapena  I, Moutsouris  K, Ham  L, Melles  GRK. Graft detachment rate. Ophthalmology 2010;117 (4) 847
PubMed
Dapena  I, Ham  L, van Luijk  C, van der Wees  J, Melles  GR. Back-up procedure for graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94 (2) 241- 244
PubMed
Ham  L, van der Wees  J, Melles  GR. Causes of primary donor failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145 (4) 639- 644
PubMed
Dapena  I, Ham  L, Tabak  S, Balachandran  C, Melles  G. Phacoemulsification after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35 (7) 1314- 1315
PubMed

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Figure 1.

Artist impression of the incisions used in no-touch Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. The main incision is at 12 o’clock (orange arrow) and the side ports are at the 10:30, 1:30, and 7:30 (right eye) or 4:30 (left eye) clock positions (green arrows).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2.

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft in a vial with organ culture medium. After stripping off the Descemet membrane from a donor corneoscleral rim at the eye bank, the tissue spontaneously forms a DMEK roll. After 1 to 2 weeks of organ culture, during which the endothelial cell density and sterility are checked, the graft is sent off for transplant in a DMEK procedure.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3.

Artist impression of the final preparation of the donor graft on the surgical table. A and B, The Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty roll is transferred into a glass bowl and thoroughly rinsed with balanced salt solution until all macroscopically visible organ culture medium is removed. C-F, After staining with trypan blue, 0.06%, for 30 seconds (C and D), the Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty roll is rinsed with balanced salt solution to remove all excess dye and form a double roll (E and F).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4.

Clinical images and artist impressions of the insertion of the Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft. A and B, After loading the graft, the glass injector is attached to a 5-mL syringe. C and D, The position of the double roll, which should be facing up inside the injector, is checked under the surgical microscope, and the injector is positioned into the main incision to insert the DMEK roll into the recipient anterior chamber. E and F, After insertion, the double roll should still be facing up. The endothelium is located at the outer surface of the DMEK graft.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5.

Clinical images displaying the centering and unfolding of a Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft within the anterior chamber. A, A small air bubble is positioned between the double rolls of the DMEK graft. Note the blue halfway up the cannula, indicating that the cannula is in part positioned inside one of the rolls (Moutsouris sign , arrow). B and C, By gently stroking the cannula over the outer corneal surface, the DMEK graft is rotated. To unroll the DMEK roll, light taps on the corneal surface (van Dijk taps) as well as manipulations of the small air bubble are used (Dapena maneuver). D and E, The air bubble is enlarged to further unroll the DMEK graft, and using the cannula at the outer corneal surface, the graft is centered. F and G, The air bubble is enlarged to completely unfold the DMEK graft and to position it onto the iris (air bubble between the graft and cornea). H and I, After approximately 10 seconds, the air bubble is aspirated and the cannula is positioned underneath the graft to inject air at the pupillary margin (air between the iris and graft). I-K, An inward fold of the DMEK graft is visible at the 4-o’clock surgical position and is repositioned, ie, unfolded, using a “bubble-bumping maneuver”; pushing the air bubble away from the fold induces an aqueous flow that unfolds the graft's peripheral edge. L, Once completely unfolded, the anterior chamber is filled with air for approximately 45 to 60 minutes. All rotating, centering, unfolding, appositioning, and fixating maneuvers should be performed with a standard 30-gauge cannula that is bent in such a way that the distal end of the cannula measures approximately 8 mm.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6.

Artist impression of the Moutsouris sign. A and B, When the Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft is oriented correctly within the anterior chamber (edges facing upward), the tip of the cannula can be positioned inside a peripheral curl so that the tip appears blue (arrows) because of the overlying blue donor tissue (Moutsouris sign positive). C and D, When the graft is positioned upside down (edges facing downward), the tip of the cannula cannot find the curls, so the tip will not change color (Moutsouris sign negative).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7.

Artist impression of the “bubble-bumping maneuver.” A, The Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty graft shows a peripheral inward fold (endothelium facing the recipient stroma). B, By indenting the outer corneal surface with a cannula, the air bubble is pushed away from the fold, and an aqueous flow is generated to unfold the edge of the graft. C, Once completely unfolded, the air bubble takes its original position to secure the now completely unfolded tissue edge against the recipient posterior stroma.

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Melles  GRJ, Ong  TS, Ververs  B, van der Wees  J. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 2006;25 (8) 987- 990
PubMed
Melles  GRJ, Ong  TS, Ververs  B, van der Wees  J. Preliminary clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145 (2) 222- 227
PubMed
Dapena  I, Ham  L, Melles  GRJ. Endothelial keratoplasty: DSEK/DSAEK or DMEK—the thinner the better? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2009;20 (4) 299- 307
PubMed
Melles  GRJ. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. Cornea 2006;25 (8) 879- 881
PubMed
Melles  GRJ, Rietveld  FJR, Pels  E, Beekhuis  WH, Binder  PS. Transplantation of Descemet's membrane carrying viable endothelium through a small scleral incision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998;39 ((suppl)) 343
Melles  GR, Lander  F, Rietveld  FJ. Transplantation of Descemet's membrane carrying viable endothelium through a small scleral incision. Cornea 2002;21 (4) 415- 418
PubMed
Terry  MA, Ousley  PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty in the first United States patients: early clinical results. Cornea 2001;20 (3) 239- 243
PubMed
Melles  GR, Wijdh  RH, Nieuwendaal  CP. A technique to excise the Descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis). Cornea 2004;23 (3) 286- 288
PubMed
Gorovoy  MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006;25 (8) 886- 889
PubMed
Ham  L, Dapena  I, van Luijk  C, van der Wees  J, Melles  GR. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: review of the first 50 consecutive cases. Eye (Lond) 2009;23 (10) 1990- 1998
PubMed
Kymionis  GD, Suh  LH, Dubovy  SR, Yoo  SH. Diagnosis of residual Descemet's membrane after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty with anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33 (7) 1322- 1324
PubMed
Dapena  I, Ham  L, Moutsouris  K, Melles  GRJ. Incidence of recipient Descemet membrane remnants at the donor-to-stromal interface after descemetorhexis in endothelial keratoplasty [published online August 1, 2010]. Br J Ophthalmol
PubMed
PubMed
Lie  JT, Birbal  R, Ham  L, van der Wees  J, Melles  GRJ. Donor tissue preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34 (9) 1578- 1583
PubMed
Price  MO, Baig  KM, Brubaker  JW, Price  FW  Jr. Randomized, prospective comparison of precut vs surgeon-dissected grafts for Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146 (1) 36- 41
PubMed
Ham  L, Balachandran  C, Verschoor  CA, van der Wees  J, Melles  GR. Visual rehabilitation rate after isolated Descemet membrane transplantation: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127 (3) 252- 255
PubMed
Ham  L, van Luijk  C, Dapena  I.  et al.  Endothelial cell density after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 1- to 2-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148 (4) 521- 527
PubMed
Bahar  I, Kaiserman  I, McAllum  P, Slomovic  A, Rootman  D. Comparison of posterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques to penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2008;115 (9) 1525- 1533
PubMed
Chen  ES, Terry  MA, Shamie  N, Hoar  KL, Friend  DJ. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: six-month results in a prospective study of 100 eyes. Cornea 2008;27 (5) 514- 520
PubMed
Mearza  AA, Qureshi  MA, Rostron  CK. Experience and 12-month results of descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) with a small-incision technique. Cornea 2007;26 (3) 279- 283
PubMed
Terry  MA, Shamie  N, Chen  ES, Phillips  PM, Hoar  KL, Friend  DJ. Precut tissue for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: vision, astigmatism, and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology 2009;116 (2) 248- 256
PubMed
Wylegała  E, Tarnawska  D. Management of pseudophakic bullous keratopathy by combined Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty and intraocular lens exchange. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34 (10) 1708- 1714
PubMed
Koenig  SB, Covert  DJ, Dupps  WJ  Jr, Meisler  DM. Visual acuity, refractive error, and endothelial cell density six months after Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK). Cornea 2007;26 (6) 670- 674
PubMed
Kobayashi  A, Yokogawa  H, Sugiyama  K. Descemet stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty for bullous keratopathies secondary to argon laser iridotomy: preliminary results and usefulness of double-glide donor insertion technique. Cornea 2008;27 ((suppl 1)) S62- S69
PubMed
Kaiserman  I, Bahar  I, McAllum  P, Slomovic  AR, Rootman  DS. Suture-assisted vs forceps-assisted insertion of the donor lenticula during Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145 (6) 986- 990
PubMed
Busin  M, Bhatt  PR, Scorcia  V. A modified technique for Descemet membrane stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty to minimize endothelial cell loss. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126 (8) 1133- 1137
PubMed
Vajpayee  RB, Sharma  N, Jhanji  V, Titiyal  JS, Tandon  R. One donor cornea for 3 recipients: a new concept for corneal transplantation surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125 (4) 552- 554
PubMed
Lie  JT, Groeneveld-van Beek  EA, Ham  L, van der Wees  J, Melles  GRJ. More efficient use of donor corneal tissue with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): two lamellar keratoplasty procedures with one donor cornea. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94 (9) 1265- 1266
PubMed
Dapena  I, Moutsouris  K, Ham  L, Melles  GRK. Graft detachment rate. Ophthalmology 2010;117 (4) 847
PubMed
Dapena  I, Ham  L, van Luijk  C, van der Wees  J, Melles  GR. Back-up procedure for graft failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94 (2) 241- 244
PubMed
Ham  L, van der Wees  J, Melles  GR. Causes of primary donor failure in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145 (4) 639- 644
PubMed
Dapena  I, Ham  L, Tabak  S, Balachandran  C, Melles  G. Phacoemulsification after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35 (7) 1314- 1315
PubMed

Correspondence

CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 7

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics